He’ll probably have no choice. It’s like taking back a girl after she cheated on you.I hope he stays! I think his agent fucked this up for him. Sign on at £140-150k a week and call it a day, Toby.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
He’ll probably have no choice. It’s like taking back a girl after she cheated on you.I hope he stays! I think his agent fucked this up for him. Sign on at £140-150k a week and call it a day, Toby.
LlorisTitle winning defence.
Toby - Sanchez - Vertonghen
Trippier...............................................Davies
Top 4 midfield
Title winning attacking midfielder
Title winning striker
Top 4 squad
Top 4 midfield
Title winning attacking midfielder
Title winning striker
Top 4 squad
140? Surely you mean the 95 now on the table?I hope he stays! I think his agent fucked this up for him. Sign on at £140-150k a week and call it a day, Toby.
Omg not sure i dare do this ... technically noWell, quite. And, since it started at the year 1, the year 2000 was the end of the 20th century, not the beginning of the 21st century.
I'm hoping this is a misunderstanding, which can be cleared up by the following:Omg not sure i dare do this ... technically no
You can't have one without the other
(End of the 20th century and beginning of the 21st is the same point in time... obviously)
Technically (and by your argument ) the year 2000 wasn't the end of the 20th century. That is the anomaly of the missing year
(It is still missing a year)
Lol he probably will end up forced to take less. Big up levy140? Surely you mean the 95 now on the table?
mate they begin and start at the same timeI'm hoping this is a misunderstanding, which can be cleared up by the following:
The end of the 20th century was 31st December 2000. The 21st century began on 1st January 2001.
If you still don't agree, start a new thread or take it to the forum toilet; this isn't the right place to be having a lengthy discussion about the calendar.
I think we were offering £130k at one point? I don’t see Levy squeezing him further if Poch wants to keep him.140? Surely you mean the 95 now on the table?
Been there, done that, shot my beans all over herIt’s like taking back a girl after she cheated on you.
nope it's a year laterWell, quite. And, since it started at the year 1, the year 2000 was the end of the 20th century, not the beginning of the 21st century.
Mate, I don't know if you're agreeing with me, disagreeing with me, or being deliberately obtuse.nope it's a year later
And the turn is the same point in time... impossible for the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st to occur at a different point in time
I agree with this. But I'm struggling to find a connection to Toby Alderweirald for some reasonMate, I don't know if you're agreeing with me, disagreeing with me, or being deliberately obtuse.
Self-evidently, if we start at the year 1, then the last year of the 20th century is the 2000th year. And, specifically, the end if the 20th century is the last moment of the 2000th year. Importanrly, the 21st century didnt start until the 2000th year had ended: ergo, it started at the very moment the year 2001 started.
Can we agree, whatever else has been said, that this is correct?
You're right - this should have ended a long time ago.I agree with this. But I'm struggling to find a connection to Toby Alderweirald for some reason
No. Don't stop for me mate. I was just being a cocky cunt.You're right - this should have ended a long time ago.
Apologies: no more.
Mate This is your mistakeMate, I don't know if you're agreeing with me, disagreeing with me, or being deliberately obtuse.
Self-evidently, if we start at the year 1, then the last year of the 20th century is the 2000th year. And, specifically, the end if the 20th century is the last moment of the 2000th year. Importanrly, the 21st century didnt start until the 2000th year had ended: ergo, it started at the very moment the year 2001 started.
Can we agree, whatever else has been said, that this is correct?