Liverpool have lost the grand total of 2 more player than us and? What happens to argument when Alderweild and Rose leave this summer?
And I’m sorry you just exaggerate to the extreme. It’s every game? There are thousands of suporters being duped by this, EVERY Spurs supporter knows this. It is just ridiculous.
So let’s break this down, what about this ‘narrative’ do you constest. Do you believe that are immune from the elite clubs? Do you believe that are an operate a tier 1 payrol? Anyone with any semblance of footballing knowledge knows it that it is difficult for us to retain our best players, that we will be vulnerable to this. I take the issue is not this but the fact that it is being referenced, the truth is you don’t want to hear what is true.
As for Klopp well he has been linked, if you weren’t looking for things to be offended about with us you would have noticed that. He was strongly linked with Bayern and Real. Why would Poch being linked with PSG, Madrid, Barca and Bayern make him an elite manager? Is Thomas Tuchel such a manager? Or Unai Emery or Zidane or Varande or Niko Kovaic?
Fucking Hell!! No I don't not believe we can compete with "tier 1 payrol" I have stated this in my previous post, I clicked "agree" in a post of yours to JT stating this when you said it's all about wages, for the love of God please have at least the decency to read what I fucking write. Unless you are finding it extremely hard to concentrate, if you are I'll clarify yet agin:
1. We are not a "tier 1" club, assuming this term of yours is applied to PSG, City, Utd. Barca, Bayern and Real Madrid. We are MILES behind these clubs, they are intact pulling away from us despite us pulling in massive amounts of new revenue. THEY OPERATE ON A DIFFERENT STRATOSPHERE. This is clear? Has this sunk in?
a) We have been miles behind the 2nd tier clubs Woolwich, Juventus, Dortmund, Atletico, Liverpool, Chelsea (I'm putting Chelsea in this bracket as their model is self sufficient over the past few years but if you wanted to stick them in Tier 1, fine mere semantics, ain't going to argue.
Since our CL run we have closed the gap on these clubs quite dramatically, having overtaken Dortmund and possibly Juve (although with them knocking us out we'll probably be level, within a £5m +/- give or take IMO). There is a double whammy as Chelsea & Woolwich both lose out on the CL money while we pick it up, this could also see it nip and tuck on the revenue score, possibility Chelsea still out front as they have just announced a new Sponsorship deal last week that was massive.
Now is that fucking clear? I do not wish to type that yet again.
Liverpool: Of course it matters that they have lost more players than us, it proves the point. They lose more players to us (they have exactly the same issue as us, keeping hold of players that can earn more elsewhere ergo the tier 1 clubs you speak of). Yet despite this Liverpool do NOT have the narrative surrounding them literally every single time their club is discussed, the only time it's spoken about is when it concerned the player involved. We have lost ONE player, yet it is us that are spoken about constantly, so yeah it matter, it is the actual point I'm making and proving.
Show me the links that Klopp was linked to Madrid, haven't seen any. Show me the links that he was linked to Bayern haven't seen any if you are referencing what his agent said a couple of months ago then fucking LOL, he was linked to them
before he took the Liverpool job though. His agent had spoken in the press about the soon to be vacant job, he dismissed it out of hand but did as any good agent would do make it clear that he could manager there in the future "why not"? If you have anything of concrete, like those that surround Poch then please link them. So given this you haven't answered, in fact you have completely dodged the question posed to you about Klopp not being linked whilst Poch has, I very common practice of yours which is again duly noted.