No, but if you really want to zoom in, then you know... in ONE ROUND Kulusevski ended up with an assist and Bailey did fucking nothing. So another proof of superiority in your eyes then? Cause small snapshot is your preference, right?
I mean, come the fuck on and get some perspective now.
Why should you focus on current season only? I know only one possible reason, cause that suits your way of thinking better.
Players have some fluke seasons and Kulu so far has underachieved this season, not entirely due to his own performances. His xA is 6,4 while he has 3 asstists. Difficult to blame teammates finishing upon Kulu. Bailey xA is 7,6 so he has in fact overperformed this season. Difference in xA is is 1,2.
So you literally take ONE season (that is not even finished yet), and you rather draw conclusions on that, instead of looking at their overall performance? Maybe it is easier to just admit that you are desperately trying to prove something, despite what all possible metrics and evidence show?
Uhhh because we’re talking about THIS season, not numerous seasons ago when Bailey was managed by Gerrard ?? A season isn’t the same as one game.
Underachieved? How about last season as well?
How about comparing their xA per minutes on the pitch?
All the metrics show Bailey is having a significantly better season. Which is what the initial conversation (who would you take THIS season over him) was about, until you barged in.
I would take this version of Bailey over this version of Kulusevski. I don’t care if Kulu was MUCH better than him when he first arrived or Bailey was much worse under Gerrard. I care about here and now.