The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
The last 10 games we played with 11 it worked... last night was a fork in the road
We start 11 v 11 Saturday.
What if wolves get one sent off and we play 11 v 10 and win ..does it still not work ?
I doubt it. Did you see us try and "pack it in" last season? We don't have the players for it and that was with 11 players on the pitch.We would’ve gotten a point if we had packed it in. Chelsea are an awful club with zero creativity whatsoever, their only strength is pace with Sterling Mudryk and Jackson. There was no way our high line could keep up with those road runners.
I think Ange sacrificed a short term point to prove a long term point to the players about never abandoning the philosophy and that’s fine and I respect him for it.
But let’s not act like it was the best decision to salvage something from the match.
Really, you would have done what has never been done before.Considering where we currently are in his tenure, as well as the players at his disposal, I would have done the same. We all know how bad some of these players are when we have to invite pressure in a low-block bus-parking session. He had an Eric Dier with 0 minutes this season, plus an out of position Emerson and Hojbjerg in the backline, as well as Porro who wasn't great defensively last year when we had to defend all game and invite pressure under Conte/Stellini
That being said, in the future, once we have a better all round squad and the players are more accustomed to Ange's system, I would like to see a little bit more pragmatism so that we can better get through situations where we inevitably will have less of the ball during a game, whether it be because we're playing city or if we have 10 or 9 men.
But we are talking years down the line here, I'd certainly give Ange this season and even next season to fine tune this team playing strictly attacking football, so that they get more mature when it comes to the movements and instructions
It doesn't matter what we think, Ange will stick with what he believes in. Found this clip on my computer while he was at Celtic.
FWIW I'd rather us go down swinging with all we got.
View: https://youtu.be/9VpK-9lMowA?si=TAzkSCojjaloLq_U
next 3 games will test us, but at the start of the season Man City was a free hit for most(except Man City fans hahaha) so 4 points from 3 is ok you melters.I’m all for Ange ball, nothing better. I didn’t mind the tactics in the second half. But with 15 minutes to go at 1-1 with 9 men Park to bus. We all knew what was coming with that high line. I know we should have equalized, potentially twice. Let’s be real though.
If we play that way over the next few games without VDV and Romero I do worry. Could totally see the subs stepping up with the way this season is going though and slipping right in. Time will tell.
//
The game is about glory and being brave our motto
I never saw a more valiant effort then I did yesterday
//
being valiant & glorious is one thing...
being street smart & preserve your foot soldiers to fight another battle is another thing
go out in a blaZe of glory is movie stuff.
Do we? Or do we just play our game regardless of the opposition.