Our Kryptonite has been Lennon, Defoe, Soldado, Townsend, Rose etc having almost ZERO end product in the final third. Our Kryptonite has been a high line. Our Kryptonite has been failing to score from corners etc.
This has not been a recent problem, we have shown a consistent inability to break down an entrenched defense for a number of years. This is nothing more than your focus on a few specific players.
How do you think we would have done if Eriksen had taken 55 more shots at goal instead of Townsend?
Probably not too much better. Either it would mean that he was incredibly wasteful or selfish, I would desire neither and an increase in that many shots would have probably accomplished nothing more than lowering his shot accuracy and given away possession. The difference between Townsend and Eriksen is not just number of shots, it's a clear indication of better decision making.
How do you think Lamela would have done with no tracking back?
Shitty. I don't want any player that lacks the ability or desire to track back to help out on defense.
Is Dembele good at holding up the ball?
Sure?
This is another case of you arguing a case just because it's me. Townsend and Lennon have 1 assist between them. They have 1 goal each. This is also not knee jerk, I claimed this before the season started.
Wrong.
This is just your way of washing away valid arguments. Instead of actually addressing my points and putting together a reasonable argument why I'm wrong, you claim that I'm biased against and am just arguing just to argue. I think you're wrong and I ALWAYS provide a full explanation why, generally with evidence to support what I say.
I never defended our quality of wing play, not did I ever defend Lennon or Townsend. In fact, I distinctly remember saying to you that I didn't like having to defend Townsend because I think he's a weakness, but you were wrong about him on a particular point.
Our Kryptonite was Soldado, getting crossed to by IDIOT players who thinks he can challenge a parked bus on his own and him getting obliterated.
In all fairness, this was the system they were put into. I won't defend their quality of play because I can't do that reasonably, but those were the tactics given to them to perform.
That is why Dembele has to be an AM in he final third. He can roll that bus on its side, and Ade also has beef. Then Eriksen and Lamela should be more open for the excellent passing stats Dembele has in the final third. Ade also had a dozen prem assists in one season, he is good at distribution int he final third.
Yes, Dembele is a solid passer. Yes, he has strength. Yes, Ade can pass as well. BUT on a rainy afternoon at Stoke when they're packing 8 men into the box, Dembele will not have the ability to "roll that bus on its side". One man by himself cannot do that, that is unless they happen to be a truly special player, which Dembele isn't. He's good, he's not that good. He doesn't have the speed, that killer instinct, and the vision that the one, magical person has to possess to break down an entire entrenched defense.
Dembele should be beating people and passing in the box. Not in his own half like that village idiot AVB made him do in a sad, withdrawn defensive role.
Don't you think that there is another reason, other than just AVB, that he isn't beating people and passing in the box??
Do you remember this?
http://cartilagefreecaptain.sbnation.com/2014/1/22/5334712/tottenham-hotspur-mousa-dembele
What has he done since then? He's been pretty average most of the time, maybe slightly better than average? He was given more room to push up, more authorization to get on the attack and he hasn't been able to do it.
The main thing: Ade, Eriksen and Lamela have a history of SCORING AND CREATING. IMO Soldado will also find his feet without remedial buildup from our so called wingplay.
Okay.[/quote]
edit: quote issues.