Also I wonder if he’s embarrassed by the dive for his red card against Luton, which would be chasteningThat's a very good point. He will miss the Villa game so hopefully the shackles will be off when he returns against City.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Also I wonder if he’s embarrassed by the dive for his red card against Luton, which would be chasteningThat's a very good point. He will miss the Villa game so hopefully the shackles will be off when he returns against City.
Unless he’s a psychopath and it doesn’t phase him
Questioned why went in for him. Could have saved the money and got eze who so much better. Johnson looks weak as well. Early days for him but if his a starting player I do worry. He never looked to get involved. May be he needs a FB on the outside supporting him rather than having FB inside. Plus he has to come deep for the ball from CBs as FB is gone inside. Not a fan of this inverted FB just makes our play too congested in the middle. Look at their winner royal is in the centre circle. We had 4 players in the CC.Name one thing that Johnson did - apart from the goal.
Anything - a cross, beat an opponent, a tackle
Anything, name it, with proof
I'm not a stats freak, anyone know what his pass accuracy was?
To Spurs players it was shit, but to Wolves players it was wonderful
Johnson's performance was not good at all
- the goal hides how poor he was
Anything - a cross, beat an opponent, a tackle
Have you seen deki cross? Explains why we don’t do it.scoring early... and then being negative thereafter is a big problem
second string players cant play ange ball.. so must adjust tactics. ange should know that?
NOt sure about you guys - but that tikki takka 12 passes to forward 20m is "painful" to watch. Not only that - this continues up the opposition box but no one likes to take a pop... crossing is now out of fashion
It probably depends on the person but hopefully not for very long because, as you say, he has to get on with itOk, whilst I agree with you, how long should it affect him (assuming it is)?
He is after all a pro, and these sorts of minor setbacks come with the job.
He was afraid of getting a booking and ban. Clean sheet after the Villa game.It's hard to judge things in isolation, but it seems that when we were playing our best football, Bissouma was ranking high on the progressive carries/take-ons to break the lines.
It feels like this part of his game has taken a dive, which is disrupting our flow.
Is he low on confidence?
I think Ange got it right.
- We needed an extra man in midfield (Hojbjerg) to protect the makeshift back 4.
- We dialed down the intensity to minimise risks of further injury
- The early goal allowed us to slow down and play keep ball
1st Wolves goal was absolute class. Excellent ball in, and well taken by the goalscorer. Vicario maybe shouldn't have been beaten at his near post.
2nd goal again was an excellent ball and a good run. A poor ball by Hojbjerg and Gil napping lost us the ball, then we forgot football basics and allowed them to take the free kick quickly, before Royal was able to get back into a good position.
Wolves deserved the point, but taking all 3 was down to our mistake - Which Ange will not tollerate.
Absolutely untrue in my case.Unduly harsh and somewhat dismissive of the opposition.
We weren't good enough and didn't do enough to deserve to win. No argument.
But much of this post-analysis is based on the result. Had we won or held on, many of the comments change in tone.
Nobody rational can dismiss us not having 3 of our season-long back 4 and our midfield creator in chief. Plainly a nonsense.
Players collectively were not as good as we needed them to be.
All the game showed is that we cannot cope with a squad decimated by the loss of 7 viable options. Only City could realistically be expected to suck that up. See Newcastle for similar to us at present.
It won't be until next season before we see a squad closer to what Postecoglou wants and needs.
It's going to widen if we keep playing like that.I'm inclined to agree with you. Not our finest hour. But the points gap at the top of the PL is still relatively small
If vic gets injured we are right in it up to our necks....
I think Ange got it right.
- We needed an extra man in midfield (Hojbjerg) to protect the makeshift back 4.
- We dialed down the intensity to minimise risks of further injury
- The early goal allowed us to slow down and play keep ball
1st Wolves goal was absolute class. Excellent ball in, and well taken by the goalscorer. Vicario maybe shouldn't have been beaten at his near post.
2nd goal again was an excellent ball and a good run. A poor ball by Hojbjerg and Gil napping lost us the ball, then we forgot football basics and allowed them to take the free kick quickly, before Royal was able to get back into a good position.
Wolves deserved the point, but taking all 3 was down to our mistake - Which Ange will not tollerate.
No, sorry, Wolves deserved the win simply because they scored 2 goals and not controversial goals and we only scored 1.I think Ange got it right.
- We needed an extra man in midfield (Hojbjerg) to protect the makeshift back 4.
- We dialed down the intensity to minimise risks of further injury
- The early goal allowed us to slow down and play keep ball
1st Wolves goal was absolute class. Excellent ball in, and well taken by the goalscorer. Vicario maybe shouldn't have been beaten at his near post.
2nd goal again was an excellent ball and a good run. A poor ball by Hojbjerg and Gil napping lost us the ball, then we forgot football basics and allowed them to take the free kick quickly, before Royal was able to get back into a good position.
Wolves deserved the point, but taking all 3 was down to our mistake - Which Ange will not tollerate.
I think Ange will take the brunt of the criticism because both goals we conceded we tried to play out and play quick which is what he wants the players to do but the problem is lack of quality on the pitch.
I think Ange got it right.
- We needed an extra man in midfield (Hojbjerg) to protect the makeshift back 4.
- We dialed down the intensity to minimise risks of further injury
- The early goal allowed us to slow down and play keep ball
1st Wolves goal was absolute class. Excellent ball in, and well taken by the goalscorer. Vicario maybe shouldn't have been beaten at his near post.
2nd goal again was an excellent ball and a good run. A poor ball by Hojbjerg and Gil napping lost us the ball, then we forgot football basics and allowed them to take the free kick quickly, before Royal was able to get back into a good position.
Wolves deserved the point, but taking all 3 was down to our mistake - Which Ange will not tollerate.