"TITLE RACE" ( There is no sense not talking about it)

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

You don’t take anything Sausage says seriously do you?

Actually, apart from his irrational obsession with championship-level Scottish footballers, I quite often do. But not his assertion that our players “downed tools” yesterday. I think that’s insulting. Away from the ball-following TV cameras you could see how gutted they were. They didn’t play well, to be sure, but they did try. Anyone who “downed tools” would never get in Poch’s squad.
 
You weren't looking for prostitutes

giphy.gif
 
Actually, apart from his irrational obsession with championship-level Scottish footballers, I quite often do. But not his assertion that our players “downed tools” yesterday. I think that’s insulting. Away from the ball-following TV cameras you could see how gutted they were. They didn’t play well, to be sure, but they did try. Anyone who “downed tools” would never get in Poch’s squad.
Apologies, Rutty, I thought when you wrote this:

watches our players in the flesh Sausage

that you were in a smutty yet euphemistic mood after a little too much brandy butter.

Ok, upon reflection, I rescind my ‘downed tools’ comment on the basis of your first person testimony to the contrary.
 
Because they are separate entities - do you think that the likes of Ali, Kane, Son and Eriksen would stop performing at that level without Poch? Seriously come on.

The likes of Vertonghen was in the PFA team of year under AVB, Dembele was superb that season. It's like trying to say that Redknapp was responsible for Modric and Bale performing to the level they do. How have those players gotten on since they left Spurs hey?
Totally disagree. Would they stop performing at that level? Quite possibly. But that's not even the point. When Poch came they were early in their careers. Poch has helped them to become the players they now are. You honestly think that if Sherwood or AVB had stayed our manager for all that time, Kane would have won the golden boot etc? Rose and Walker were pretty shit, Dele was no more than a promising kid playing for MK Dons, Kane was slow, overweight and couldn't get in our team, Dembele was nowhere near as good under AVB than at his peak under Poch (IMO), Vertonghen did well at first but then was a shadow of himself under Sherwood, Lamela was shit, Eriksen was very promising but was scared of tackling, didn't work half as hard as he does now, wasn't half the player he is now. If you read Poch's book all the players say that he was absolutely influential in their becoming who they now are.

If we had signed someone like Bale or Modric at their peak, like Real Madrid do, and that player has continued playing at the same level, I would say that the manager hasn't influenced their development. But he has taken young players with promise (of whom there are many, most of whom fail to make it at the top level) and now a lot of them are world class players.

You must agree with me that 99% of Spurs fans think we are very lucky to have Poch, right? So that you means you think they're all wrong and you're right.
 
Welcome to the hoods school of economics

1) The CL doesn't produce enough income.


2) Dippers spending comes from Coutinho's sale


3) Oh no wait a minute, ignore point 2


And while you're at it ignore point 1 as well.

Destroying his own argument, in every post contradicting himself.
Tying himself up in knots when he gets pulled on something and ends up digging his own hole.
Well done for picking up the batten. There comes a point however that you will get more sense talking to a spoon and lose the will to live.
This is how I imagine The Hood in everyday life.....
 
There's quite a few things wrong with this post.

- We are trying to compete. Hence why we have finished 3rd, 2nd, 3rd and currently sit in 2nd place in the league. In terms of wages and transfer fee's we cannot compete, but that doesn't mean we cannot compete in the league. It's just harder for us to do so.

- We won't always be behind them. We've finished above every single team in the top 6 currently over the last 3 seasons. We'll likely finish above 3 of them again this season.

- Liverpool have also spent £100,000,000+ that hasn't been recouped via selling players.

- We pay a lot more wages than Leicester do. We are 6th on the wage scale. Which incredible tells you all you need to know about how well we are actually doing. But that's increasing. Kane and Dele have doubled their salary in the last year alone.
I believe we could compete financially with them if we acted like they do. As are a big club that generates obscene amounts of money. But Liverpool's owners understand sport, that winning is good for business..and they are bloody yanks, but somehow they have more of a grasp on football than our owners......hhhhhmmmmmmm very weird don't you think!!
 
I don't think anyone who is rational would question Pochettino's ability as a coach. The evidence speaks for itself and him being courted by the biggest clubs in the world merely adds to that belief.

And we have been on a superb run, with the Woolwich game being the one blot up until the Wolves match. It is also fair to say the team may have been fatigued, but then the lack of changes? Or change to a back 3 to protect?

I am not sure results like Saturday can't just happen and only Liverpool this season have avoided such a loss but it's that enduring worry.

Some say depth of squad and some say tactical nous. I think it's fine margins but knowing how to win silverware and having the feeling of winning silverware adds an edge of belief. To be angry at the team for losing can feel uneasy but how else can we translate the pain? How else do we say not again or what can we do to help?

Liverpool have the City game to navigate to be Champions. Not 100% certain but in the high 70s plus. Klopp will know anything that avoids a loss maintains the momentum. They have been astonishing whatever anyone thinks.

Klopp, like Ranieri and Conte has found the perfect blend and been so far pretty lucky with injuries. It nearly always has to be the combination of factors but they have also had lots of games (league cup aside). What is not going to happen is that we will be Champions. Whatever that need is we still don't have it.

So I have no idea how this plays out and am not sure what the answer is but either we lack an overt leader on the pitch or we lack physical arrogance at times. We also and for whatever reason always fall just short and yet player for player it's hard to see why Liverpool for example are 9 points ahead of us.

For sure though, losing games is worse than drawing games and I would much rather we had 1 point less but only 2 losses. It talks of a team with greater resolve if people can understand that.
 
Last edited:
More interesting debates in here than a lot of threads.
People that don’t like the thread, maybe run along to the transfer thread where you can read tweets about German teenagers who like Harry Kane etc
Or look at Bergers heat map...
 
People are struggling with this.

For me the really pertinent question is why are we not good enough? Why could Leicester have that collective season of a lifetime? Why were Chelsea able to find that certain something. City we can accept because they had all the tools. But Liverpool this season?

I mean player for player, would we really say they are that much better, if at all? Leicester had who (Vardy and Mahrez but 2 they are 2 players), Chelsea and Liverpool had and have bought who? Liverpool's front 3 yes and Van Dijk of course and Chelsea got a brilliant season from Hazard (what's new) and Luiz/Kante but any central defender been better than Vertonghen has been in that time? Any striker really been better than Kane over the last 4 seasons? Has anyone strode way above Eriksen?

So it's really hard to put a finger on it. Really hard to know what more could be done or if it is just buying players that makes the difference, because it seems too simplistic to this writer although important without doubt.

We are a strange strange club but you finish 3rd (when 2nd was ours, 2nd, 3rd and sitting 3rd again, but with different winners and you think why are we not bridging the gap and how is it that other teams jump so far ahead in 3 or 4 months?

Really conceptually quite a challenge in my mind.

Losing to Wolves was a by product.
 
For me the really pertinent question is why are we not good enough? Why could Leicester have that collective season of a lifetime? Why were Chelsea able to find that certain something. City we can accept because they had all the tools. But Liverpool this season?

The points tell the story. Leicester won it at a canter with 81 points. Just a random fluke season where all the moneyed clubs were in chaos and/or rebuilding. Chelsea got to 93, but didn't have any European campaign to stretch or tire their excellent but thin squad. City got an unthinkable 100, and Liverpool are actually ahead of that pace.

We were young and inexperienced the Leicester year. We've been better than that Leicester team every season since, but it doesn't matter when the bar flies up into the stratosphere. Leicester's 81 might not make top four this year.

Who knows if it's gonna take 100+ point seasons to win titles for the foreseeable future. These things can ebb and flow. But so long as that's the case, a very healthy dose of luck, on top of everything else is going to be a necessary component of a title challenge.

It's just crazy how good the top sides are now.
 
Well done for picking up the batten. There comes a point however that you will get more sense talking to a spoon and lose the will to live.
This is how I imagine The Hood in everyday life.....



More like pipes but I see what you mean

:paulinhobored:
 
The points tell the story. Leicester won it at a canter with 81 points. Just a random fluke season where all the moneyed clubs were in chaos and/or rebuilding. Chelsea got to 93, but didn't have any European campaign to stretch or tire their excellent but thin squad. City got an unthinkable 100, and Liverpool are actually ahead of that pace.

We were young and inexperienced the Leicester year. We've been better than that Leicester team every season since, but it doesn't matter when the bar flies up into the stratosphere. Leicester's 81 might not make top four this year.

Who knows if it's gonna take 100+ point seasons to win titles for the foreseeable future. These things can ebb and flow. But so long as that's the case, a very healthy dose of luck, on top of everything else is going to be a necessary component of a title challenge.

It's just crazy how good the top sides are now.
The financial gaps continue to widen, and it will ruin the league. The EPL is well on it's way to becoming just another La Liga or Serie A where its 2/3 financial behemoths that win every year whilst everyone else makes up the numbers. The TV money helped raise some ships, but at the end of the day it made the top clubs that much richer and so it wasn't the help to smaller clubs it was made out to be...did keep some from going bust, at least.

It's free market capitalism at its worst. The rich, by the nature of the market, will have a greater opportunity at success. That success will result in larger financial gains meaning they start next season with an even greater advantage. Rinse, repeat. The EPL needs a spending cap (and one that isn't tied to revenue, as all that will do is set in stone the spending advantage of top clubs). The problem being that instituting one will simply be the catalyst to the formation of a European Superleague
 
People are struggling with this.

For me the really pertinent question is why are we not good enough? Why could Leicester have that collective season of a lifetime? Why were Chelsea able to find that certain something. City we can accept because they had all the tools. But Liverpool this season?

I mean player for player, would we really say they are that much better, if at all? Leicester had who (Vardy and Mahrez but 2 they are 2 players), Chelsea and Liverpool had and have bought who? Liverpool's front 3 yes and Van Dijk of course and Chelsea got a brilliant season from Hazard (what's new) and Luiz/Kante but any central defender been better than Vertonghen has been in that time? Any striker really been better than Kane over the last 4 seasons? Has anyone strode way above Eriksen?

So it's really hard to put a finger on it. Really hard to know what more could be done or if it is just buying players that makes the difference, because it seems too simplistic to this writer although important without doubt.

We are a strange strange club but you finish 3rd (when 2nd was ours, 2nd, 3rd and sitting 3rd again, but with different winners and you think why are we not bridging the gap and how is it that other teams jump so far ahead in 3 or 4 months?

Really conceptually quite a challenge in my mind.

Losing to Wolves was a by product.
Mentality. That intangible bastard.
 
Although I am emotionally done with any title race, the fact that Warnock said we aren't in it makes me want us to do it Champions League style.
 
Back
Top Bottom