Simple.
Give me your Top 4 squads in the league this season. Do we make the Top 4?
Give me your Top 4 squads in the league this season. Do we make the Top 4?
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Man City
LiVARpool
Spurs
Man U
Chelsea
in no particular order
LiVARpool
Spurs
Man U
Chelsea
in no particular order
Chelsea, Liverpool, Spurs, City. United just miss out, too reliant on Fernandes, weak defenders and not much depth.
City
Liverpool
Man U
Spurs
Chelsea
Liverpool
Man U
Spurs
Chelsea
No.
We may be top 4 in term of balance and depth, but raw quality and room for improvement from within Chavski, Man U, Man City and Dippers squads are better.
Chavski may get better under a better manager. Some of Man U players not fulfilling their potential, but if they do, they can do much better. And manager too. Man U is doing well, but it's more to do with the chaos nature of this year and the quality of their nature. Like how Ranieri got that one season wonder with Leicester, but he's not here to get his team challenge and winning every year.
We know the full power of Man City and Liverpool. Even when they have not been at their best, they're still around challenging position. Few additions, and they're in a monstrous level.
All of 4 them can spend silly money, while we have to work around a budget.
Not the same can be said about us. Beside PEH, Kane, Son, LLoris, every other positions can be challenged/ upgraded if the new incoming is at those 4 level. Our current rotation option is adequate for Europa League level, but when we're back in CL, we need better quality, or we end up running our XI into ground.
We may be top 4 in term of balance and depth, but raw quality and room for improvement from within Chavski, Man U, Man City and Dippers squads are better.
Chavski may get better under a better manager. Some of Man U players not fulfilling their potential, but if they do, they can do much better. And manager too. Man U is doing well, but it's more to do with the chaos nature of this year and the quality of their nature. Like how Ranieri got that one season wonder with Leicester, but he's not here to get his team challenge and winning every year.
We know the full power of Man City and Liverpool. Even when they have not been at their best, they're still around challenging position. Few additions, and they're in a monstrous level.
All of 4 them can spend silly money, while we have to work around a budget.
Not the same can be said about us. Beside PEH, Kane, Son, LLoris, every other positions can be challenged/ upgraded if the new incoming is at those 4 level. Our current rotation option is adequate for Europa League level, but when we're back in CL, we need better quality, or we end up running our XI into ground.
Yes we have a top 4 squad.
City have the best imo. Followed by Chelsea then Liverpool then us. I put Chelsea before Liverpool but it’s very close. The fact Liverpool came into this season with 3 senior CBs and no depth at LB or RB is the reason I put Chelsea ahead of them.
5-8 I’d go Everton, Leicester, Man United then Woolwich.
The fact Southampton are this good is a major credit to their manager.
City have the best imo. Followed by Chelsea then Liverpool then us. I put Chelsea before Liverpool but it’s very close. The fact Liverpool came into this season with 3 senior CBs and no depth at LB or RB is the reason I put Chelsea ahead of them.
5-8 I’d go Everton, Leicester, Man United then Woolwich.
The fact Southampton are this good is a major credit to their manager.
City, pool, Chelsea, us
on paper. That could mean fuck all with shite managers
on paper. That could mean fuck all with shite managers
Latest Ranking - Euro Club Index
www.euroclubindex.com
He's definitely been on the juice. I can't think of any footballer who's physique has changed like that in a relatively short space of time.
Oh sorry, misread the thread title.
Tottenham’s annual wage bill, as Maguire explains, is small compared to their so-called ‘Big Six’ rivals, with Woolwich (£232m), Chelsea (£286m), Liverpool (£310m), Manchester City (£316m) and Manchester United (£332m) ,Spurs’ is £179m, Everton’s £165m
Without Bale we have less than Everton LOL
Without Bale we have less than Everton LOL
Overall, City have the best squad. Liverpool probably the strongest 'first choice' XI.
We're probably on a par with Chelsea, and United are a mess of a squad with enough good players and fanboy VAR officials to win enough games to be up there.
We're probably on a par with Chelsea, and United are a mess of a squad with enough good players and fanboy VAR officials to win enough games to be up there.
We have the best squad and it will be proven in May
Spurs First Team Players & Squad | Tottenham Hotspur
Check out the first team players and squad for Tottenham Hotspur, find out who is playing in what position and more facts about the players.
www.tottenhamhotspur.com
Not bad out of 29.
From the Strongest to the Weakest squads in prem
1. City
2. Liverpool
3. Chelsea
4. United
5. Spurs
6. Everton
7. Leicester
8. Wolves
9. Woolwich
10. Villa
11. Southampton
12. West Ham
13. Leeds
14. Palace
15. Brighton
16. Fulham
17. Newcastle
18. Burnley
19. Sheffield
20. West Brom
1. City
2. Liverpool
3. Chelsea
4. United
5. Spurs
6. Everton
7. Leicester
8. Wolves
9. Woolwich
10. Villa
11. Southampton
12. West Ham
13. Leeds
14. Palace
15. Brighton
16. Fulham
17. Newcastle
18. Burnley
19. Sheffield
20. West Brom
Your data is from a season before Bale joined, so his wages not included
I’m still trying to figure out if Utd are over performing or under performing.
Still think they are the dark horses of this campaign.
But they do have a good spine of the team so not sure if dark horses is actually really the correct term.......
Still think they are the dark horses of this campaign.
But they do have a good spine of the team so not sure if dark horses is actually really the correct term.......