No chanceIf he wins the cup and gets us in the top 4 we have to make him permeant don't we?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
No chanceIf he wins the cup and gets us in the top 4 we have to make him permeant don't we?
I think ideally he sticks around on the staff of the next manager and manages the U23s. That ought to do him 5 years until about 34. Then maybe move up to a spell with a club like QPR or Fulham...4-5 years of that and maybe he's ready for the gig full time. You get the timing right and Mason could manage Spurs for 25 years.Don't think so, it'd all fall apart through lack of experience and respect from the players by Christmas. No reason he can't come back after 5+ years in a lower league though.
Agreed. If he does well the remaining 6 matches this season, I think he will be able to get a good opportunity lower down the pyramid soon. He's not even 30 yet. He's one for the future, though.Nah it’s too much at this stage in his career. Needs to get experience managing elsewhere first, imo, but he looks promising, and if all goes ok, I’d happily have him back after a few years
Chavs hired Lampard to distract their dumb fan base because of the transfer ban and it worked but then he got good players and had no fucking clue.I think ideally he sticks around on the staff of the next manager and manages the U23s. That ought to do him 5 years until about 34. Then maybe move up to a spell with a club like QPR or Fulham...4-5 years of that and maybe he's ready for the gig full time. You get the timing right and Mason could manage Spurs for 25 years.
I'd hate to appoint him just to sack him, hard to go back from that. Chavs probably pretty disappointed they appointed Lampard way too soon.
Agreed. Subs were not bad because of tactics and purpose behind them.What was dodgy about them. Winks played well, involved in the build-up out from the back that got ruled out for offside. Winks is actually better than Ndombele and PEH when he drops between the CB's (loads he can't do that they can but when we are pushed up, in possession on the ball this element he's better).
Lo Celso wasn't having a great game, still looks to be struggling for match fitness, something that Lamela absolutely doesn't lack, always a dynamo when selected. Bergwijn again will keep the press going up top with fresh legs.
In no way whatsoever did the subs have a negative impact on the game.
Same players, different Manager.Agreed. Subs were not bad because of tactics and purpose behind them.
Even average players can be good if setup to succeed.
Most obvious Joe Clash multi yetJust fuck off with the sentimentality. He has no business managing anything above age 11