How many minutes Kane plays has absolute nothing to do with whether Poch's answer is true
Well it does as there isn't anyone who interchanges position with Kane - either from the 3 attacking positions behind him, the bench or the squad.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
How many minutes Kane plays has absolute nothing to do with whether Poch's answer is true
its a Giant Bacon Lettuce and Tomato sandwich for dyslexic Spurs fansSpurs1882DW , can you enlighten me to what 'LGBT Spurs' is and more of what she actually said? Sounds very odd to say the least
I was surprised that you got so many likes and nobody hit the disagree buttonThank you and you're very welcome, it was my pleasure.
What was the lilywhite house like from inside?
What pisses me off with this is that it's up to the player. I would not give a fuck if Harry Kane was gay. It would make no difference to me and he would get no abuse from me, either would any oppo gay player.Here's the link to their website, which should explain all: Welcome to the Proud Lilywhites
Don't quote me word-for-word on this, but the question or more accurately political statement, was something about the recent reports of one or more gay footballers, going public about their sexuality before the end of the season.
She then went on a rant about diversity in the workplace and if it was a Spurs player that goes public, would the other players in the dressing treat him differently or ostracised him and what sort of abuse would he be subjected to by opposition players etc. etc. I'm sure you get the gist of it.
HL was very professional and attempted to say something along the lines of that it does not matter, everyone is equal etc. but she rudely interrupted him and started ranting about something else, which was completely irrelevant. Thankfully, one of the staff took the microphone off her and we moved swiftly onto the next question.
That's probably the best way I can explain it, but trust me when I say it was not appropriate and was delivered in such an aggressive tone.
Hey, if I want to find THAT kind of 'Cock' on the Internet, I know just where to find it, thank you very much.wrong 'Cock' website?
We must be watching different matches. I see Kane and the attacking mids interchanging quite a bit. Not in the way a left and right winger swap positions for large parts of a match of course, but in the way we build our attacks and how players move off the ball. Naturally that's in the eye of the beholder, and even more so to what extent it means we don't need a striker. I think we need a striker added to the squad as well.
But calling Poch a lier who dances to Levy's tune based on that, when Clinton, when coming on, quite clearly takes up Kane's position with Kane dropping into midfield, is just wrong.
I didn't say that. Poch, and every other professional, can toe the party line but not necessarily agree with it without being disingenuous.
And come on, Clinton is completely a completely different player to Kane, nobody in the squad swaps into Kane's place.....the only time Kane gets a rest is when the match is deemed irrelevant or already won and over.
But I fail to see how Kane getting injured ruins the season,
Again, I didn't say that.
You are purposefully avoiding my point and creating new points for me.
The fact stands that Kane plays every minute he needs to as we don't have another player capable of doing the things he does.
Trust me we can't rely on Son, Chadli, Clinton, whoever filling for at centre forward for Kane if we want to finish higher than 6th-8th.
You are purposefully avoiding my point and creating new points for me.
Who would you play as the 1 in a 4-2-3-1 if Kane was injured?Oh and
My arguments are on point. You'll have to excuse for expanding a bit and not using "because it's tall, it must be a giraffe kind of logic" (your "Kane plays every minute he needs to as we don't have another player capable of doing the things he does") and a logic of trust me....based on absolutely nothing.
TrippierWho would you play as the 1 in a 4-2-3-1 if Kane was injured?
Who would you play as the 1 in a 4-2-3-1 if Kane was injured?
That works.If, as is the case now, we have three other attacking mids in really good form, then Son all day long. Also it would demand having Alli or Mason playing one of the three, as having Son up there instead of Kane would make the runs beyond the striker all the more important. A combination of say Eriksen, Dembele and Lamela would be no good behind Son for that reason imo.
If not then Son in att mid and Clinton up top but the two interchanging for shorter or longer intervals as the game demands it.