I've zero problems with an individual rating thread, but can we just keep it to rating the players. By having the war and peace on the "match" is irrelevant and only means that those that disagree (or agree) with the comments results in having two match threads.
So suggest just stick to the player ratings a small run down/explanation on each rating if someone wishes to do that. Then if he or anyone wishes to put their thought on the game there is a place already in existence to do just that, it's called the match thread.
That’s just his style. Has been for over a decade.
The usual ratings thread starter would just give a brief opinion on everyone who played, followed by a rating, and the match poll. Everyone else would pile in with their views.
BC would always chime in with a 100,000 word thesis. SC is a lot like TFC, so as you can imagine it would get lots of praise and abuse. There really is no SC cliche.
Personally I don’t really give a shit either way, but I think BC can be left alone to post his thoughts and argue his battles against critics in a more reasonable manner. BC is clearly not anti-Spurs. He’s fucking obsessed (in a good way)!