The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
If we did get Capello - I think we'd see Lamela play a whole lot more. I'm no expert on how he sets up though.
To be honest I'd back us to win against Southampton with Sherwood and co., purely based off of that "New manager" syndrome.
Sherwood is Danny boys inside man!!! The blokes a snakeGeneral opinion is that Danny Boy likes Sherwood and sees him as a potential future manager (!!?!!) so i guess this is just to give him a go
I heard someone say AVB said it in his post conf after the game.. fuck knows if anyone is going to bother nowOh btw
I heard we appealed Paulinhos red card, can anyone confirm if we did and the outcome?
Fucking hell mate,did you have to park on the black catI just prey we get some speed up.
My wife and her family are all west ham, my dad is saints and my sisters boyfriend is Liverpool.
This could be the worst week of my life.
I just prey we get some speed up.
My wife and her family are all west ham, my dad is saints and my sisters boyfriend is Liverpool.
This could be the worst week of my life.
Means the world mate, thank youJesus.
Pray for ChrisOTDH :avbpray:
Hi JDK, presumably that would mean Defoe and Soldado?I'd be pretty surprised if we didn't play a 4-4-2 on Wednesday.
Hi JDK, presumably that would mean Defoe and Soldado?
That will be high risk considering the back four we're liable to be fielding, which will have liability written all over it, in all likelihood. Also there will be a temptation to play two wingers with 4-4-2, more high risk.
We'll see how it pans out, but 4-4-2 in our current predicament worries me. If it was a League game I wouldn't be bothered by the gamble, as I've given up on top 4. But I so want us to win tomorrow, on so many levels.
3-5-1-1 might be safer. Shore up the defence as best we can is my overriding thought. But then again, maybe 4-4-2 and go for it is the best way.
Until we see the personnel on the team sheet, and then see on the pitch if we've patched up anyone and done an AVB mistake fest, it's so hard to know.
If for example we're going to patch up Vlad, who's not much good in the air anyway, we need as many tall defensive guys as we can find who can head the ball somewhat. Defoe don't fit the bill, nor does Lennon or Holtby. Holtby I want playing. Decisions, decisions
Hi JDK, presumably that would mean Defoe and Soldado?
That will be high risk considering the back four we're liable to be fielding, which will have liability written all over it, in all likelihood. Also there will be a temptation to play two wingers with 4-4-2, more high risk.
We'll see how it pans out, but 4-4-2 in our current predicament worries me. If it was a League game I wouldn't be bothered by the gamble, as I've given up on top 4. But I so want us to win tomorrow, on so many levels.
3-5-1-1 might be safer. Shore up the defence as best we can is my overriding thought. But then again, maybe 4-4-2 and go for it is the best way.
Until we see the personnel on the team sheet, and then see on the pitch if we've patched up anyone and done an AVB mistake fest, it's so hard to know.
If for example we're going to patch up Vlad, who's not much good in the air anyway, we need as many tall defensive guys as we can find who can head the ball somewhat. Defoe don't fit the bill, nor does Lennon or Holtby. Holtby I want playing. Decisions, decisions