Fuck me they are raving about SU's 2 chances (apart from the goals) which all game, bar one, in the last 10/15 mins as if they should have won it.
What about the 5 shots on target Kane had, the 2 Mason had and the 3 other Eriksen had on target besides his 2 goals?
Fuck me, we also had enough chances in the first half to make them need 6 goals to force ET. They, lie theirs, never went in.
It's like they are saying they deserved to win and if it wasn't for Eriksen's 2nd, Flynn - with is 5-10 min cameo - would have been MOTM, despite all the chances we had down their right?
Robinson - the one ex spurs pundit they could pick from East Yorkshire and Beagrie the North Yorkshireman and former SU player are hardly neutral are they?
When Robinson said 'that's the sign of a keeper low in confidence" or something to that effect when Vorm had the ball knocked out of his hand by their players arm got my nut. I thought the rules were that if a keeper has the ball in both his hands he is in control of the ball. Isn't it then a foul if it is knocked out of his hands when challenged by an opponent?
He obviously never saw the saves the 'out of form' keeper made recently.