I just find this whole targeting of the perceived "weaker" elements and pandering to the perceived "stronger" or "most popular"elements a bit distasteful but also fucking outmoded and old school. His whole divisive thing just getting a bit tedious, even if it has some "results" upside.
As we all know - and saw in subsequent games - Dier is just as likely or even more likely to give a stupid VAR penalty away than Aurier.
Yes, I get that and understand how the message of any manager can become stale. As much as Klopp's gurning dame Edna on an E match day antics can irritate the fuck out of us, I do think he comes across as a far more genuine and likeable human being than Mourinho and has still managed to produce a phenomenally efficient winning football team - two in fact, and both in leagues where he wasn't managing the biggest/riches team - teams who also play progressive brands of football in a very competitive modern era.
I have said previously I can see how Mourinho's methods can get results, I don't think he's stupid, and we have already seen the early signs, post lockdown, of the Mourinho-fication of our team IMO, minor improvements in game management, simplification of remits to suit the type and level of players we have more, as opposed to the naivety of Poch counter-intuitively trying relentlessly to play chess with draughts -back to front possession football with midfielders that don't want the football, high lines with no high pressure, FB's up the pitch and wheel-less wardrobe CB's.
Just because it gets results doesn't always mean everything is justified. I don't like some of Mourinho's methodology and I don't particularly enjoy watching some of it.