First, let me start with the disclaimer, I am an American supporter (though I will be moving to London for at least a year in three weeks). I can certainly understand the annoyance with the pandering and focus on American, Asian, and other non local support. The blatant desire to attract overseas supporters makes me cringe on a consistent basis. However, it isn't really a Spurs problem but rather a Premier League problem. To compete financially in the Premier League—especially at the top—courting international support has become a necessity. During this year's preseason only five clubs didn't go to America, Asia or Australia to play a friendly. Those clubs were Hull, Burnley, Southampton, Stoke, and Sunderland. Every one of those teams played a game on the continent.
I agree that the local supporters often get overlooked in favor of the international supporters. The one thing I didn't understand,
Flav
was your complaint that the rise in ticket prices has to do with international support. Obviously there is legitimate gripes about day trippers using stub hub and buying tickets at inflated prices but surely the vacationers can't make up more than 1% of the crowd. That number even seems high.
Isn't the rise in ticket prices more attributable to the change in demographics of the English football fan in the wake of the creation of the Premier League? Surely the commercialization, widespread availability on TV, and the clamp down on hooliganism has shifted football away from it's original ethos as a working class sport and the owners have attempted to bring more corporate groups and affluent British fans into the game because richer fans=more profit.
Doesn't make sense to me how international fans who don't have the ability to go to games are to blame for exorbitant match day prices. Certainly there is toooooons of legitimate gripes regarding the courting of international fans but that seems a bridge too far IMO.