His exact words apparently were: the game has gone.If a city fan cant enjoy the football city play and gets bored..i dont think he particularly likes the sport.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
His exact words apparently were: the game has gone.If a city fan cant enjoy the football city play and gets bored..i dont think he particularly likes the sport.
Basically proves the point that money talks. And for all everyone's lip service to equality, they are happy to forget about it if your team wins a few trophies.
True colours coming out left, right and centre.
Its worse when you put it into words isn't it?It’s just the hypocrisy is staggering, it’s truly unbelievable. How is anybody to believe a word that comes from the Premier league’s mouth.
How is it that the working class and football fans in general can be held to a vastly higher standard than the actual rich owners of these clubs. Ban people for homophobia and racism but let the game be run by slave owners, racist homophobic murderers.
It makes you so cynical of everything, it makes you feel nothing is sincere, it’s just a game where people at the top using morality as a means not for improving society but keeping others at bay. Worse still is the passive and sometimes happy acceptance of this by the media who have obviously be bought out.
No. I’m not. I’m saying lesser evils. I’m saying a moral owner does not exist. It can’t exist. In answer to the questionSo you are equating Saudi Islamofacists with the Conservative Party. Fucking hell.
No. I’m not. I’m saying lesser evils. I’m saying a moral owner does not exist. It can’t exist. In answer to the question
A communist would at the very least put the team first.Not really, I dislike Joe Lewis a lot. But we are talking about links to a government that has spread the ideology than underpins ISIS and Al-Qaeda and has the most appalling human rights. If this is acceptable than why should theoretically Joseph Stalin not be allowed to buy a team. It’s the lowest of the low, it embarrassing.
You carried on supporting spurs while we employed a racist criminal?If someone is fine with this fine but don’t ever give me a moral lecture on anything, ever!
You carried on supporting spurs while we employed a racist criminal?
Jonathan Woodgate of course. Him and his gang chased a guy, called him paki, bit him, fractured him etc. Our owners bought him.Scored in the league cup final for us afterwards.Who are you referring to.
Jonathan Woodgate of course. Him and his gang chased a guy, called him paki, bit him, fractured him etc. Our owners bought him.Scored in the league cup final for us afterwards.
So since our current owners employed a known convicted racist. You are okay with owners who are fine with racism?Not exactly the type of pro we should be having I agree, not sure how that is comparable to being funded by a government with direct links to terrorism that has the most appalling human rights you can think of
The Tories sell weapons to said 'islamofascists' ... are those who deal arms to criminals much better than the criminals who pull the trigger themselves? Or are they all covered in the same blood and valuing profit over lives?
Stupid question. To be the owner of the vast majority football clubs in the premier league you need to be a billionaire. Or at least close to that level in terms of individual net worth. There is no such thing as an Ultra High Net Worth Individual WITH morals as in order to accumulate such wealth you have to a bad and amoral person.
Name me a football ownership structure that is virtuous and on the right side of the argument? I don’t think you can.
Unless you are in Germany in which fan ownership is a thing.
Newcastle’s new owners are awful, and it shouldn't be allowed. But we are getting into a debate about lesser evils. Our ownership: tax dodging, Conservative party donating, scrounges who were willing to let the government pay their staff during the pandemic and constantly support governenment policy and in doing so tacitly support growing inequality and poverty in this country. They bankroll the very things that are wrong in our society and people like Marcus Rashford are fighting against.
So please don’t suggest a “moral owner” is a thing. Because it is not. The only moral ownership structure is majority rule fan ownership.
But that won’t happen here. So I have accepted that whoever owns our club is will be an amoral cunt - but I’d rather take an amoral cunt who will invest in the team and see us as more than a live events venue (that they didn’t even pay for)
Not sure how you've ended up with it but they're not my words you're quoting.....
You can take the boy out of Leeds...Jonathan Woodgate of course. Him and his gang chased a guy, called him paki, bit him, fractured him etc. Our owners bought him.Scored in the league cup final for us afterwards.
So you are equating Saudi Islamofacists with the Conservative Party. Fucking hell.
So since our current owners employed a known convicted racist. You are okay with owners who are fine with racism?
Eh, it quoted you? That is .. odd.