Ratings - West Ham (H)

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ArcspacE

ENIC OUT NOW !!! ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Hugo - 6
Aurier - 6.5
Dav - 7
Dier - 7
Davies - 6
Sissoko - 6.5
Gio - 8
Dele - 3
Son - 7.5
Kane - 7
Moura - 2

Lamela - 7
Bergwijn - 6
Winks - n/a
 
Hugo - 6
Aurier - 7
Dav - 7
Dier - 7
Davies - 6
Sissoko - 7
Gio - 8.5
Dele - 6.5
Son - 7.5
Kane - 7
Moura - 6

Lamela - 7
Bergwijn - 7
Winks - n/a
 
Hugo -7 - Decent
Aurier - 6 - Good energy, shit going forward
Dav - 5 - okay but erratic as always
Dier - 7 - solid, looks in best shape in years
Davies - 6 - solid
Sissoko - 6 - good stamina, good effort, offers nothing else
Lo Celso - 8 - best on the pitch, top top player
Lucas - 5 - quiet game, should have scored
Dele - 5 - offered very little
Son - 6 - decent, looked to make things happen
Kane - 7 - big improvement, should have had 3 or 4

Subs:
Lamela - 5 - classic Lamela, ran about offering little, should have scored
Bergwijn - 5 - offered slightly more than Lucas but was afforded more space
Winks - N/A

Mourinho - 5 - meh.
 
Last edited:
I'm not a big Lamela fan but he really made a diff when he came on.
Sissoko was the guy that won us the game. He bossed it.
GLC is not doing it for me. Dele and Son tried but failed.
Davies was really, really good.
Eric Dier is a CB. Big contract for him, please.
Dav was good. There, I said it!
Aurier was really, really good.... except for when he presented a massive unnecessary chance to WHU..grrr
Did Lloris have a save to make?
Sir Harry.....fantastic..

Edit: I have 4 funnies ..which is better than having 4 fannies, I suppose.
 
Last edited:
Lloris - 6

Aurier - 7
Sanchez - 7
Dier - 7.5
Davies - 7

Sissoko - 6
Lo Celso - 8.5*

Lucas - 6
Dele - 6
Son - 6.5

Kane - 7
 
Hugo - 6
Aurier - 6.5
Dav - 7
Dier - 7
Davies - 6
Sissoko - 6.5
Gio - 8
Dele - 3
Son - 7.5
Kane - 7
Moura - 2

Lamela - 7
Bergwijn - 6
Winks - n/a
Dier deserves more in my opinion, and I´d say Davies too. Should have an assist for Lucas in the first half, was solid with and without the ball. I´d also give Bergwijn a 7, not to mention a place in the first team.
 
Hugo -7 - Decent
Aurier - 6 - Good energy, shit going forward
Dav - 5 - okay but erratic as always
Dier - 7 - solid, looks in best shape in years
Davies - 5 - average
Sissoko - 6 - good stamina, good effort, offers nothing else
Lo Celso - 8 - best on the pitch, top top player
Lucas - 5 - quiet game, should have scored
Dele - 5 - offered very little
Son - 6 - decent, looked to make things happen
Kane - 7 - big improvement, should have had 3 or 4

Subs:
Lamela - 4 - classic Lamela, ran about doing nothing, should have scored
Bergwijn - 5 - offered slightly more than Lucas but was afforded more space
Winks - N/A

Mourinho - 5 - meh.
You’ve clearly got a vendetta against Lamela if you’ve given him 4.

Did well to win the ball off West Ham outside our box, ran into space, good ball to Son who assisted Harry.

Kept possession well throughout. Made some important interceptions. Passed well. 7/10 minimum.

4/10... What did he do to you? Fuck your dad?!
 
For starters he created 2 very good chances (Son who scored, but was 2mm offside and he put it on a plate for Kane who put the ball just wide), but his overall game was excellent.
He was our only "creative" player and I was disappointed.
This was WH United not Manchester United.
 
You’ve clearly got a vendetta against Lamela if you’ve given him 4.

Did well to win the ball off West Ham outside our box, ran into space, good ball to Son who assisted Harry.

Kept possession well throughout. Made some important interceptions. Passed well. 7/10 minimum.

4/10... What did he do to you? Fuck your dad?!
No vendetta fella. I was one of Lamela's biggest supporters in his early years, but i've seen enough of him over the past 7 odd years he's been here to know he's never going to be good enough, and his attacking output (which should be the main output for a player in his position) is just plain crap.

Perfect example tonight. He was in space on the edge of Spams box, on his left foot, had an absolute AGE time-wise, yet due to pure and utter lack of ability, he simply couldn't get the ball under sufficient control to muster a shot on goal, and ended up going on some pointless mazy dribble that lead to us ending up back in our own half.

But he won a tackle in his own half which miraculously wound up with a shitty West Ham team being caught on the break, which will have fans dancing in the streets about how amazing he is and how much "pashun" he's got.

Perhaps 4 was a bit harsh. Tell you what, I'll give him a 5 if it makes you feel better. :adethumbup:
 
Hugo -7 - Decent
Aurier - 6 - Good energy, shit going forward
Dav - 5 - okay but erratic as always
Dier - 7 - solid, looks in best shape in years
Davies - 5 - average
Sissoko - 6 - good stamina, good effort, offers nothing else
Lo Celso - 8 - best on the pitch, top top player
Lucas - 5 - quiet game, should have scored
Dele - 5 - offered very little
Son - 6 - decent, looked to make things happen
Kane - 7 - big improvement, should have had 3 or 4

Subs:
Lamela - 4 - classic Lamela, ran about doing nothing, should have scored
Bergwijn - 5 - offered slightly more than Lucas but was afforded more space
Winks - N/A

Mourinho - 5 - meh.

Why Mourinho a 5 when we won by 2 goals and kept a clean sheet?
 
Back
Top Bottom