The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
FTFYPSG must surely be laundering oil money.
City is just laughs and United a bit more cunty but Liverpool wins hands down when it comes to having the unlikeable fans. Some of the things they say and make up is just artistic. I so hope there is a banana peel or a beach ball this year.So funny seeing the arrogance of united fans on twitter thinking it’s 2008 and they can just take who they want from us re Kane. Fucking arrogant cunts. Hope city smash them on Sunday
£68m
Are you masquerading as some one with inside info?
You speak in certain terms. Where are you getting this drivel from?
The hypocrisy on this forum tho....
This team is awful and has been for about 18 monthsJesus Christ the negativity in this thread. Pull yourselves together mates. Yes, we’re going through a rough patch and yes we need a couple good signings this summer to tighten up our defence but this team isn’t as bad as you think it is. Especially up front. I’ll give Harry at least one more year, if we shit the bed next year then it’s anyone guess
Nope.
No comments from Kane....
No talk of "new challenges".
#NoEriksen
Just the latest installment in years worth of the same media shit stirring surrounding Kane.
Edit: Don't like facts, fanboy?
You enjoying being an Inter fan now?
Lol, do you ever get tired of your own bullshittery?
How do you he hasn’t said that? To anyone? Ever? He’s getting to an age where perhaps he wants some glory and get Bale rich. It’s business no one would fault him given the shit show the team has become. I give him one more year under Jose LevyHas anyone got actual quotes of Harry saying he is considering his future elsewhere?
Or even anyone credible and close to Harry/the club saying so?
I'm yet to see one thing, it's all a load of bullshit and there are one to many melts on here.
For the record, this is everything I would've said in disagreeing with the same post, so now I don't have to post it myself. Good job.Your argument hinges on whether you believe the above.
Over the last five years he's been flogged (Rochdale comes to mind) by us. At another European club with a 'fit-for-purpose squad' game time could be carefully managed and perhaps injury mitigated.
Personally I don't think he's any more injury prone than Salah or Aguero.
Of course not, but still north of £100m
I don't think the Greaves record motivates him. Most strikers have only a rough idea of how many goals they've scored in a season (the total PL + pre-season + League Cup etc.).
In my view, what motivates him is winning titles, cups and securing lifetime financial security for his family.
That will be determinned by him, his agent and the size of the cheque we receive.
That's just really depressing. As I said in another post, there's no point predicting sad worst case scenarios like this. I also talked about how far the state of the art in medicine has come in treating athletic injuries: there are so many people on the tennis circuit right now, including basically all of the Big Four, whose careers would've been over a long time ago if they were playing even just a decade earlier. Progress is constant and the gains being made are still not rounding off.Theres a good chance its already it. He tore a tendon of the bone ffs.
People acting like its a sprained ankle.
So I see history is already being re written.A thought occurred to me: people in here are talking about a crocked Torres as an example of injury-relared transfer business but don't we have a better example closer to home? Spurs bought Ndombele just this summer gone for a club record fee and so far he looks like a footballer in his 30s and on the wane (in terms of fitness).
Did the club not understand what they were buying or did they spend 55m on him anyway? Kane is far fitter than Ndombele when neither has an active injury. And Ndombele seems to spend just as much time on the table from the limited evidence we have so far.
Based on all of that noise, why wouldn't someone else take a similar gamble on Kane? 55m for a sick note with high potential versus 100m for a proven world class striker with all the individual plaudits available but a potential injury problem? I know which I'd pick if it was my money.
And I'm not even in the "sell Kane" camp so I don't know why I'm formulating this argument. I guess the number of people trying to sell him while deflating his value got to me enough to justify him still being worth a nine-figure fee.
That's just really depressing. As I said in another post, there's no point predicting sad worst case scenarios like this. I also talked about how far the state of the art in medicine has come in treating athletic injuries: there are so many people on the tennis circuit right now, including basically all of the Big Four, whose careers would've been over a long time ago if they were playing even just a decade earlier. Progress is constant and the gains being made are still not rounding off.
Football is dead to me once Kane retires. He feels like the key link that keeps me identifying with the England squad.