According to this site
http://www.squawka.com/teams/tottenham-hotspur/stats
I've no idea of the validity of many of these stats, but it seems this site has plenty of them, so I like it anyway . Even if I suspect I may end up disagreeing with some of its analyses, if my first reading of the performance ratings is anything to go by.
Apparently the second most amongst all the major teams in Europe
http://blog.squawka.com/2013/02/18/...n-any-other-team-in-europe-spurs-are-second/?
Apparently more than Barcelona, which I find hard to believe, but hey what do I know?
http://www.squawka.com/teams/barcelona/stats
Though Barc have nearly twice as many goals from considerably less chances.
What I do know is IF these stats are correct, we're a lot more creative than many people, myself included, would have thought. Much will depend on what is meant by a 'chance', but at first sight these are shockingly good figures on the creative side.
Going back to the performance ratings, I'd love to know how we get 110 for winning at OT and 687 for winning at West Brom.
I guess it's just about the raw data, shots on target, pass completion, rather than who we're playing, the context of the game, previous histor, etc.
http://www.squawka.com/teams/tottenham-hotspur/stats
I've no idea of the validity of many of these stats, but it seems this site has plenty of them, so I like it anyway . Even if I suspect I may end up disagreeing with some of its analyses, if my first reading of the performance ratings is anything to go by.
Apparently the second most amongst all the major teams in Europe
http://blog.squawka.com/2013/02/18/...n-any-other-team-in-europe-spurs-are-second/?
Apparently more than Barcelona, which I find hard to believe, but hey what do I know?
http://www.squawka.com/teams/barcelona/stats
Though Barc have nearly twice as many goals from considerably less chances.
What I do know is IF these stats are correct, we're a lot more creative than many people, myself included, would have thought. Much will depend on what is meant by a 'chance', but at first sight these are shockingly good figures on the creative side.
Going back to the performance ratings, I'd love to know how we get 110 for winning at OT and 687 for winning at West Brom.
I guess it's just about the raw data, shots on target, pass completion, rather than who we're playing, the context of the game, previous histor, etc.