"Yid" chanting...

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Yid chants, offensive?

  • Yes

    Votes: 27 7.8%
  • No

    Votes: 317 92.2%

  • Total voters
    344
DEFINITION

In Yiddish, the word "Yid" Yiddish: ייד is neutral or even complimentary, and in Ashkenazi Yiddish-speaking circles it is frequently used to mean simply "fellow," "chap," "buddy," "mate," etc., with no expressed emphasis on Jewishness (although this may be implied by the intra-Jewish context). Plural is יידן [jidn].
In Yiddish, a polite way to address a fellow Jew whose name one does not know is Reb Yid, meaning "Sir." The Yiddish words yidish or yiddisher (from Middle High German jüdisch) is an adjective derived from the noun Yid, and thus means "Jewish".
 
The essence of you argument is wrong.
I have been going Spurs since 1972, and when I was old enough, around 12 1976 when I started going every game, I understood when heard all the anti semitic chants from Arse, West Ham and Chelsea and Millwall fans. Did we call ourselves YIDS then? NO, we didn't.
Whilst the monkey chants and banana throwing stopped, the anti semitic chants towards us never did. Nobody did anything about it, that is until we started using the word YID. Not even Baddiel. He was doing his Avi Cohen and Jason Lee stuff when he could have.
So, how will us not using the word it stop them? A racist, Nazi is a racist Nazi.
Are you going to have the brothers stop using Nigger as a term of endearment? It's all about context. Rightly so the brothers have reclaimed the word. However, it's still offensive if used in a derogatory way, and the racists will always say it in that manner. That's the essence of all this...context.
They need to start arresting the fans they escort to our ground who vitriollically chant 'hook nose', 'one man went to gas' and hiss, etc., etc., ad nausea on their way to WHL, and then eject them when they start it up inside.
Why did they do nothing to those West Ham fans last season who 'hooked nosed', 'hissed' and sung about Hitler?
Until you nick/eject their fans for doing it, it will not stop.

What really makes me laugh is that Arse, West Ham and Chelsea also have Jewish owners. Chelsea owe their recent success to a Jew, and if it wasn't for the money of that Ashkenazi Jew they'd not even be here today.
Total respect and I agree - ged rid of the Nob-heads.
 
However, it's still offensive if used in a derogatory way, and the racists will always say it in that manner. That's the essence of all this...context.
They need to start arresting the fans they escort to our ground who vitriollically chant 'hook nose', 'one man went to gas' and hiss, etc., etc., ad nausea on their way to WHL, and then eject them when they start it up inside.
Why did they do nothing to those West Ham fans last season who 'hooked nosed', 'hissed' and sung about Hitler?
Until you nick/eject their fans for doing it, it will not stop.

What really makes me laugh is that Arse, West Ham and Chelsea also have Jewish owners. Chelsea owe their recent success to a Jew, and if it wasn't for the money of that Ashkenazi Jew they'd not even be here today.

Ahhh, yeah, but no but... Hook-nose & Hissing don't containt he word YID, therefore don't offend Baddeil, therefore it don't count!
Context is fuck all in this day and age of instant opinion... if you hear it, you;re offended by it, regardless of taking the wider context into consideration... after all, if the jumped up pricks on the internet say Spurs fans and not Chelsea/West Ham are the racists for shouting YID, then obviously we're racist!!

the whole one-sidedness of the subject stinks to high heaven!
 
The essence of you argument is wrong.
I have been going Spurs since 1972, and when I was old enough, around 12 1976 when I started going every game, I understood when heard all the anti semitic chants from Arse, West Ham and Chelsea and Millwall fans. Did we call ourselves YIDS then? NO, we didn't.
Whilst the monkey chants and banana throwing stopped, the anti semitic chants towards us never did. Nobody did anything about it, that is until we started using the word YID. Not even Baddiel. He was doing his Avi Cohen and Jason Lee stuff when he could have.
So, how will us not using the word it stop them? A racist, Nazi is a racist Nazi.
Are you going to have the brothers stop using Nigger as a term of endearment? It's all about context. Rightly so the brothers have reclaimed the word. However, it's still offensive if used in a derogatory way, and the racists will always say it in that manner. That's the essence of all this...context.
They need to start arresting the fans they escort to our ground who vitriollically chant 'hook nose', 'one man went to gas' and hiss, etc., etc., ad nausea on their way to WHL, and then eject them when they start it up inside.
Why did they do nothing to those West Ham fans last season who 'hooked nosed', 'hissed' and sung about Hitler?
Until you nick/eject their fans for doing it, it will not stop.

What really makes me laugh is that Arse, West Ham and Chelsea also have Jewish owners. Chelsea owe their recent success to a Jew, and if it wasn't for the money of that Ashkenazi Jew they'd not even be here today.
I am told by a reliable source, that the cctv cameras in the new ground will be able to identify every single face in a crowd of 61000.
They will have no excuse then.
 
Yes, I knew you'd be disappointed - l posted it only as a matter of interest. Perhaps it would help the Met's ever decreasing resources if they no longer have to worry about it at the Lane? And can concentrate on the people who are using it to abuse, and offend.
Mate, there are going to be police at the Lane come what may. That's why I find it frustrating.

It is a dying insult, without question. But the issue I have is that because a distinct percentage of Jews who attend WHL are not generation-ally divorced from the slur, it's assumed that no Jew in the ground has an issue with it, and therefore the police can decide that it isn't universally offensive. That just doesn't seem right to me, especially at a time when we have seen a significant increase in anti-Semitic attacks in the UK.
 
Mate, there are going to be police at the Lane come what may. That's why I find it frustrating.

It is a dying insult, without question. But the issue I have is that because a distinct percentage of Jews who attend WHL are not generation-ally divorced from the slur, it's assumed that no Jew in the ground has an issue with it, and therefore the police can decide that it isn't universally offensive. That just doesn't seem right to me, especially at a time when we have seen a significant increase in anti-Semitic attacks in the UK.

l don't think the Met has assumed that at all, and as you say it would be wrong of them to do so. I think they've simply acknowledged the difficulty of making charges stick at our ground.
 
l don't think the Met has assumed that at all, and as you say it would be wrong of them to do so. I think they've simply acknowledged the difficulty of making charges stick at our ground.
Of course they've assumed it. They're making it very difficult to prosecute someone in WHL if they're making a blanket statement that the use of the slur is universally ok while in the stadium. Can we really say that there are never going to be anti-Semitics in WHL that wouldn't aggressively taunt a Jewish fan with the slur?
 
It remains a highly emotive issue, which I think is healthy because it generates discussion & keeps the topic in the public domain. For that reason, I don't think that there is a significant erosion of the term.

As @joeclash says, it comes back down to "context"- & I'm specifically referring back to the "N" word/ "Y" word debate that adorns the forum toilet wall. If I demonstrate hostility using either word, or my use of either word is motivated by hostility, then it's a racially aggravated use of that word.

As @smokedsalmon says, there are dangers in any blanket policy, although I don't think that any Spurs fan chanting the word in the context of an "army" alongside several hundred/thousand other fans, would be using the word in a negative way. Owning the word in a large group is part of a fan's identity with other fans & the club. Most of us will have done it without giving it a second thought.

The danger I think is that rival fans can point to a blanket policy if their use of the word is in a racial or negative context. They can seek to hide behind the decision & it's where the line can get very blurry.

I still think that the use of the "Y" word has to be looked at on its own merits. If you have rival fans "hissing" & using the word in a negative way, it's still racist. If our travelling fans use it later today when we go 5-0 up, then I don't think it is.

I still see why so many people do find it offensive but it is part of the club's identity & used affectionately & positively by a large number of fans. It will always be a delicate subject & a fine line will always need to be trodden. That's no bad thing.
this. its exactly what baddiel did.
 
How can anyone find it offensive. Here is the definition, copied and pasted

In Yiddish, the word "Yid" Yiddish: ייד‎ is neutral or even complimentary, and in Ashkenazi Yiddish-speaking circles it is frequently used to mean simply "fellow," "chap," "buddy," "mate," etc., with no expressed emphasis on Jewishness (although this may be implied by the intra-Jewish context). Plural is יידן [jidn].

In Yiddish, a polite way to address a fellow Jew whose name one does not know is Reb Yid, meaning "Sir." The Yiddish words yidish or yiddisher (from Middle High German jüdisch) is an adjective derived from the noun Yid, and thus means "Jewish".
 
The Met getting away from this is/was inevitable on the basis that you can't arrest 20,000 people and the chanting had clearly no racist intent. From the perspective of managing a crowd, no one could possibly arrest those numbers and no judge could say that it was used en masse by our fans in an antisemitic way.

This should never have been a legal debate, it's a moral one. We can debate this forever on the moral side and it's never going to go away.

It is clear that some Jewish people take offence at the word Yid, this is not just David Baddiel, who has made a serious mistake in trying to tackle it the way he has. Would a Chelsea fan like a Spurs fan lecturing them on some of the offensive rhetoric coming from their fans?

We need to be mindful of it's connotations outside of the Lane, I have said it before but I would rather we found other ways of identifying ourselves as Spurs fans, I don't think that's the majority view though, that's on this forum or at the ground.

In the context of the game, when used by Spurs fans I know it's not offensive, but us continuing to use it forever, I am not sure that's right.
 
I know this is complicated, but surely something that has evolved from racism ending up in something that counters racism, as Spurs fans standing tall together is reason enough to be proud of the Yiddo-chants.

There is a lot of good reasons to have a go at people that are being racist, xenophobic etc. This isn't it, and for that reason I think it should be applauded as an example how people should react when someone in your group is attacked in some way or another.
 
Back
Top Bottom