He doesn't even post his own ratings.
Just agrees with a few people each week (even if they are quite different ratings to each other) and disagrees with dozens on a quick glance.
Then posts this trollop as though it means something.. we can only assume that this media average in their opinion is more correct than the forum average.
Yet when you break it down, the media average, his agree average, disagree average and total forum average all follow a strikingly similar correlation (with the exception of Davies), albeit starting from a 1-2 point higher 'base line'.
What this poster doesn't like is to see high ratings for players. He thinks it's 'more correct' that player ratings start from a lower base line but doesn't consider the ratings relative to other player ratings.
So disagrees to make a point they don't quite understand what point they're trying to make themselves fully - hence they are an idiot.
If you rate any player 9+ this moron will click disagree. It's as simple as that.
Having gone through their agrees / disagrees, I can't find an exception to this rule.