A quick temperature check, because I often see people saying “How many more goals would we be scoring if Kane was still here?”
My view is honestly, it would be a marginal improvement at best. Kane would have definitely bagged a load under Ange, but on the flipside Son and Richarlison would be far less productive stuck out on the left wing all the time.
For context, Son and Richarlison this season:
19 G+A playing as the no.9, but only 6 G+A combined from the Left wing.
So, do we need a Striker to attempt fill that HK shaped hole in our hearts or do we actually buy a proper left winger who can change the dynamic of our attack?
My view is honestly, it would be a marginal improvement at best. Kane would have definitely bagged a load under Ange, but on the flipside Son and Richarlison would be far less productive stuck out on the left wing all the time.
For context, Son and Richarlison this season:
19 G+A playing as the no.9, but only 6 G+A combined from the Left wing.
So, do we need a Striker to attempt fill that HK shaped hole in our hearts or do we actually buy a proper left winger who can change the dynamic of our attack?