We are spending more because of the stadium.
Without it we wouldn't be able to spend more.
We've the 5th highest wage to turnover ratio.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Without it we wouldn't be able to spend more.
We've the 5th highest wage to turnover ratio.
Energetic grafter, little ability on the ball IMO. Not for me, but he could add goals a la Lampard did at his age but not a style of player I wanna watch although 100% > Hoj as a squad player
View: https://twitter.com/fabrizioromano/status/1697323143881224357?s=46&t=6hp9556H_GJ_LQNWePnt-g
We’re in the endgame now Zomb, just need Levy not to be a stingy bastard for this one
I love how every year journo’s say he’s hard to deal with. Like it’s some sort of revelation and the football world doesn’t already know
He had a solid gold chance with that windfall to get at least a decent portion of the fanbase back onside with some ambitious spending, actually fuck that, not even ambitious, we should be able to afford £150m net spend in 1 window, if Chavs can spend 3-4x that figure every window with a similar size fanbase and much smaller stadium, why couldn't we spend that in just one fucking window where the need for a big rebuild was clear for all to see. Our business would be good if the squad were essentially the finished article, a few really astute additions in VDV, Vicario and Maddison that unequivocally improve the first XI in each position, but our game vs Fulham displayed to us all just how woefully short on strength in depth we are.
I literally cannot fathom the whole "we must sell before we buy" bollocks, I really can't. We've been having the same issues trying to cut loose our deadwood for the last 3 calendar years now, we know these players are not good enough to play for us, we've only managed to secure loans for the vast majority of them, and even that has stopped this year by and large. It's plain as day we're gonna see a lot of these guys frozen out until their contracts expire. Whether they're under contract or not, they're unequivocally not good enough to be part of the squad, so why would that even factor in to replacing them? If anything, NOT replacing them in advance would probably give them the sense they can just sit tight, wait for an injury and take their place back in our first XI.
1.1bn euro TV money vs £5bn for the premier league
Bums on seats is the least important aspect of income
He’s better than Skipp. If it was to replace him I can sort of understand it. But that doesn’t seem to be the case. A replacement for PEH maybe but he’s a different type of player so not sure that adds up either.
But nothing surprises me with our transfer policy it always feel a bit unplanned as though we are winging it.
Immaterial when you’re closer to West Ham than City or United.
You said they it was among the least popular leagues with some of the least money and then you compare it to the richest league in the world....
Vicario
Porro Romero VDV Udogie
Maddison Bissouma Gallagher
Johnson Richarlison Son
Run run run run run run run run run run run go go go go go go go go
i give
Gatsby
that honor
Im not backing levy up here but we did sign a replacement for Kane and that was Richie. We’ve also signed an attacking mid on madders and we’ve signed a top centre half too. Richie was obviously a huge mistake but stop acting like we haven’t spent money. We have
Depth isn't tested by playing all backups together, depth is tested by having the players slot in for first XI players. A nearly fully rotated team playing poorly doesn't tell you anything.
Good riddance.
He was funny as an undiagnosed tumour.
I'm banned from starting threads
