Yes mate. And I stand by it 100%
Sorry if it upsets you so much, but I can't disguise how I feel.
I don't think you would switch to ENIC out. I think you would swivel and squirm and find a way to apologise for them no matter what.
Maybe you'll prove me wrong. But I very much doubt it. But that's an opinion I'm entitled to.
And remember, it was you that then started running around like a kid with a smacked arse demanding bets left right and centre, on stuff you admit I hadn't posted, just because I gave an honest opinion.
And, of course, it's unlikely to proven that ENIC are taking dividends or scurrying money away from the club even if they were. Particularly as the only evidence you would be prepared to accept are figures from their own accounts.
When you post on a public forum, you need to learn to accept others will form their own opinions based on your posting history.
Get over it.
As expected, you try and twist everything and choose not to address the points I raised.
Instead you try and turn it into something else.
I never asked you what believed about my post,or what you thought Enic might do.
I'm not upset about anything and of course you are entitled to your opinion. As am I.
You started a completely false premise that I had said that you believed that they would take dividends.
All because you were too chicken shit to take the original bet.
Why can't you admit that you were wrong.
It's not a sign of weakness.
Once again you show your complete lack of understanding of finances and accounts.
If Enic were to start taking dividends, then by law, they have to be shown on the official accounts.
No doubt you will come back with some bullshit about them being able to hide it.
So let's get back to the point at hand and maybe this time you will actually answer the questions and remember that the original bet was your doubts about my changing to Enic out IF they were to START taking dividends
Do you believe I was wrong to include in the bet something that you doubted my word on?
Do you admit that I never claimed that you said anything about dividends?
Do you admit that you accused me, wrongly, of saying that you talked about dividends?
Do you admit that you demanded evidence for something that I never said?
Even going so far as to ask for me to pay to your charity if I couldn't find it a qoute?
As you say it's OK to admit when you're wrong.
Practice what you preach mate. (Says he, fully expecting more twisting of words and no admission of your error)
*Your words being that you doubted that I would switch to Enic out if they started to take dividends.
You are right about one thing though.
People will form an opinion based on posting history.
So when someone continues to post false and out of date charts, when they continue to make blatantly false statements and are unable to back those up with facts, when they consistently twist things to avoid an issue, when they continually criticise the owners but can't actually be arsed to get up from behind the keyboard and actually do something about it, then, yes, they will be judged.
