The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
For everyone dying for real news...
Who: JJetset
When: 16th July
Where: Twitter
Italy is nice this time of year
I shit you not... this is it.
Yikes! Talk about a long walk for a short drink of water...Judging Barkley with the words "Largest signing ever" makes little sense.
The market is not stagnant or stable. It grows.
We sold Modric for £30 million in 2012. By todays standards, that's an incredible bargain and hard to even look at. Yet back then we thought £30 million was great money.
Today Siggurdson is worth £50mil+. Back in 2014 we swapped Siggy for Davies.
My point here is that players who were worth £10-20 million in 2014 are now worth £50 million because the amount of money has vastly increased.
2016-17 League Winner Total = £150 million
2014-15 League Winner Total = £95m
2011-12 League Winner Total = £60m
People don't seem to understand that in 5 years the amount of money earned has almost tripled - as have player prices.
Rather than see it as "Record signing" you could equally see it as us spending £10 mil, if it was 2013. Is Barkley worth £10m? Obviously. Yet proportionally, that's all that £30 million is now, due to the amount of money flooding into the Premier League.
You can look all over Europe, but unless a miracle happens like Dele, you're not going to get an attacking midfielder for less than £20m.
Example? Bernardo Silva.
2015-16. 44 games, 7 goals, 3 assists. Quite a mediocre season
2016-17. 58 games, 11 goals, 12 assists. Very good, but not world class.
Transfer paid after 1 good season? £45mil + £17 mil add ons = £62million for a player with a singular good season.
Please stop saying "Oh, but £30million, record signing" without perspective. £30 million is nothing these days.
Sunderland got relegated, yet managed to sell their keeper for £30mil.
Ajax sold Davy Klaassen for £25 mil.
Liverpool bought Salah for £45 mil
Bourthmouth bought Nathan Fucking Ake for £20mil.
£20-30 million is peanuts.
For the Barkley fence sitters!
Yikes! Talk about a long walk for a short drink of water...
I'm saying that I don't want Barkley at 40-50million 2017 £s... I understand inflation, my point was that I'd be less concerned about his flaws if we were getting him for under £20mil now(a bargain as you say).
For £45mil who would you rather get Bernardo Silva or Ross Barkley?
Yikes! Talk about a long walk for a short drink of water...
I'm saying that I don't want Barkley at 40-50million 2017 £s... I understand inflation, my point was that I'd be less concerned about his flaws if we were getting him for under £20mil now(a bargain as you say).
For £45mil who would you rather get Bernardo Silva or Ross Barkley?
Middlesbrough have broken their transfer record to sign striker Britt Assombalonga from Nottingham Forest for a fee believed to be around £14m.
He or the club is stupid enough to let Barkley's contract get down to months, that more than anything would dictate his feeBBC:
We wont' be picking up a PL, English International for chump change. We have a bench warmer at thirty million already.
Koeman is not stupid.
He or the club is stupid enough to let Barkley's contract get down to months, that more than anything would dictate his fee
I do agree but let's be honest, its Levy. He knows what he is doing financially, I am sure he wouldn't spend way too much on players and risk the wellbeing of the club.Debt with a new stadium could be awful for the club, if we went completely gung ho.
Woolwich underestimated the costs of their stadium and had to take out new loans mid-construction and then sell off star players for years to fund it.
I always want the club to be smart with its money, but at the same time we need a fair degree of ambition here. Transfers don't always guarantee success, but they are a sign of intent. The signals we've given the past few transfer windows are "We're content with this, we need to save money". I think this is a shame, we could have won the title two years running with a bit more ambition.
You should because we don't have Arab or oligarch money to pay or bails us out if goes wrong.Am I the only one that doesn't particularly care that much about transfer fees? I'd rather get Barkley for 35m than not at all.
In other words, we don't want to do a Leedsmouth.You should because we don't have Arab or oligarch money to pay or bails us out if goes wrong.
I think Barkley has 'Levy signing' written all over it. Last year of contract (reduced fee), English international (sell on has a premium attached), young with potential to improve and possibly not playing at his ceiling yet (ability to increase asset value for resale profit).
I don't know how clubs account for players as assets, but I suspect buying Barkley (or similar) has an immediate uplift as his worth on a 5 years contract will be significantly higher than what is probably going to be paid for him.
When you say "goes wrong" what do you mean? When we continue to fall short?You should because we don't have Arab or oligarch money to pay or bails us out if goes wrong.
A couple of "don't care attitude" Sissoko signings.....When you say "goes wrong" what do you mean? When we continue to fall short?
For everyone dying for real news...
Who: JJetset
When: 16th July
Where: Twitter
Italy is nice this time of year
I shit you not... this is it.