I’ve praised him for his three good performances for us, Madrid was one of those games, though I’d argue that it was how we deployed him was more to do with it, we exploited the space behind Marcelo as he was playing so high. To be specific Trips was played through, his ability dint get him in behind Madrid but the ball for him to get on the end of, as I’ve said he can’t take on a player, he has NEVER taken on a player he doesn’t have the quality to do so, which given his position is more than a worry. The other couple of games he played well in it was the same thing, we played him in behind.Sorry, I am new here, but I'll take myself a liberty to say that you are not anti-Trippier enthusiast but a bullshit artist. Your rant is based on nothing and is factually wrong -
1) Why are you talking about his "last year assists" when this year he assisted goal against Everton, then against APOEL, two against Huddersfield, one against LIVERPOOL (in 4-1 win) and one against Real (in 3-1 win).
2) As pointed out in caps lock and also in my initial post - he played in two of the best games of our season. If anyone would even try to suggest that he is absolutely unable to defend, then I would like to get in depth overview how we kept attacking stars of Madrid or Liverpool on 1 goal? Please - do explain how it works?
3) About giving away fouls - in this season Tripps averages 0.6 fouls per game. Compared to 1.7 of Aurier. No comments. I understand that you were talking about specific kind of fouls, but - you cannot say with straight face, that (EVEN IF ALL of his faults would be the ones you described, while they are not) 0.6 per game is "consistently" or even worth mentioning.
4) About inability to tackle - when we look at their comparsion per 90 minutes basis in EPL current season - Trippier tackles won is superior to Aurier (1.83 vs 1.49) while Aurier has lost clearly more tackles then Tripps (4.21 vs 2.32). Read this point through once more. Aurier loses on average 1 tackle for every 21 minutes and you are saying that Trippier is bad at this (remember! we are talking about relative terms as compared to Aurier).
5) About slowing down and not creating - per 90 minutes Trippier completes 28.5 forward passes compared to Auriers 23.7. Among that there are on average 1.74 key passes and 2.08 chances created (!) compared to Aurier's 0.62 on both aspects.
6) While I don't have comparsion on the "backpost headers" - generally the areal duels won % is pretty much equal. 54.55% for Trippier and 53.49% for Aurier.
I do agree that Aurier is faster then Trippier. And might happen that Aurier will take step forward in future - he might have the tools. Also I dont argue that Trippier positioning can be improved- it can. At the same time he is not at least giving away ball in very dangerous position.
So the conclusion of my points is that no - Trippier is not shit. But your opinion is full of it and not based on reality. Thanks and have a good day.
As for his defending against Madrid, he didn’t have to do much, as we pushed him up high to best get him behind Marcelo. Seeing as you say he was so good at defending in this game how about giving some examples of it, I can’t recall any, would like you to list some specifics of these amazing defending skills he did in this game.
I mentioned his stats for last year because this is what Trippier lovers always quote but don’t know the context they came about. I mentioned his PL assist sats this year, why the sarcasm? Again, two of these were throw-ins.
I’m not comparing Trips tackling against Aurier’s. It’s the biggest thing that Aurier has to adjust to his game, needs to stay on his feet and not sell himself so freely. Because Aurier is struggling in this department doesn’t mean Trips is good, he’s simply not.
Is Aurier fast? I don’t think he is, I thought he was when we signed him, but that was bassed largely off Youtube clips but having seen him I’m not convinced he’s all that pacey, certainly not in the realms of Rose and Walker but for sure he’s quicker than Trips, but a snail would give Tripps a good race.
I’d also argue the reason for your backwards passing stats are twofold, Aurier plays higher up the pitch than Trips (given his ability to beat a man), a forward pass would mean a goal kick as he’s one of the furthest forward. Trips however is banging in aimless early, long balls into the box (hardly ever finding a Spurs player).
Now my turn for sarcastic dig, get your head out of Stato Christmas annual and look at how we play, use your eyes and back that up with stats. Stats are just numbers and without context a number it shall remain. My eyes tell me that Aurier is a far, far superior player and that we look a far better outfit when he plays and Trips doesn’t.
Aurier has lots to work on with his game but all the ingredients are there, Trips lacks many of the raw ingredients.