wearing a baseball hat indoors, there can only be two reasons for that, it's either covering a fresh hair implant, or someone stapled it to his head, I can't think of any other explanation
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I think it's 100% on Moshiri, he has a duty of care to get the best deal for the shareholders. This means sourcing several potential buyers. Look at the Utd deal for how it's meant to be done, the eventual two remaining bidders then found themselves putting in multiple bids (x4?? It think) with each bid the price rose, and the structure changed etc... Even the Chav deal which was ultimately the Government selling it (and we know how utterly shit they are) had potential bidders falling over themselves to buy a distressed asset which ultimately went to double what it should have been.The PL seem so complicit in their downfall. Instead of saying yes to 777 providing those conditions are met (which they don’t seem to be anywhere near to satisfying. Eg. They’ve 6 weeks to find £500m, when they haven’t been able to show they have it for 7 months!) instead of just a flat no then Moshiri would have had no alternative but to find a different purchaser. Yet by saying yes, all the PL have done is delay the pain.
It makes me wonder about this owners test and the legality of it, should it be challenged. Why else has no purchaser failed it (as far as I’m aware)?
15 | Brentford | 34 | 9 | 8 | 17 | -7 | 35 |
16 | Everton | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | -12 | 33 |
17 | Nottingham Forest | 34 | 7 | 9 | 18 | -18 | 26 |
18 | Luton Town | 34 | 6 | 7 | 21 | -28 | 25 |
19 | Burnley | 34 | 5 | 8 | 21 | -32 | 23 |