Dier and Wanyama not last year they were not and injured most of it. I agree that Dele should not play DM but given the options there was not much choice.
Skipp I cant really comment on - I am not sure anyone with confidence.
Dele didn't play DM once for us last season and if he did it was rare.
I wouldn't expect him to do so. We have Dier, Wanyama and sadly Winks for that position. All of which have been chosen to play there over him and rightly so.
You dont get it which is weird....Winks is better in CM than Dele. Winks was taken off.
Moura is better than Dele as an AM. Moura is behind Dele.
Dele was ahead of Son when Son was tearing the shit out Dortmund in the CL at the start of 2017 (when Dele was suspended). Despite being shit in the PL, he was still first choice ahead of Son, when we were playing a front three.
Ditto Lamela.
NONE of you wanted Dele dropped. He has been played ahead of form players, so you can try and create a situation where the only other option was Dier (who is still better than Dele in CM) but its not the case.
Winks is better in CM than Dele. Never said he wasn't. I am also aware Winks was taken off and I already told you Eriksen was the one took his place in deep midfield. Very debatable whether or not Lucas is a better AM than Dele and I'm also not sure Moura is behind Dele either. He would have started if Kane didn't.
Son, with his whopping 3 goals in his opening 14 games in the 17/18 season is form?
Whilst Dele had 5 goals and 1 assist in less games (due to his CL suspension) ?
Not sure what you're getting at here. Has Dele been preferred to Son at times in the past? Most likely. He can play in a variety of positions in many different formations. 3 at the back with 1 up front, Dele can play in one of the AM positions. 4231? Can play in one behind the attacker. 433? Dele can play in a midfield 3.
Luckily that's changed to the point where Son has played up top with Kane now.