The thing is city done exactly the same , if it’s not a foul why haven’t we learnt and stuck a man between them and the keeper?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
He backed into him , maybe not enough to knock him over but it put him off balance , thing is they done it every corner yet we don’t react and put a man on the keeper ourself ?
No, no, no. Some fela here will tell you he’s soft keeper. Fucking ridiculous to call themselves Spurs fans.Harrison makes no attempt at the ball. That has to be a foul. Doesn’t allow Vic to make a play
But he wasn’t just standing his ground. He pushes himIt’s simply not, though.
Players are entitled to their spot on the pitch just as much as keepers. The City obstruction was worse and I didn’t necessarily think it was much to complain about either.
Harrison never once looks at the ball. That always used to be a foulNah, that's less of a foul than the City play...
This is the obvious and correct answer.Blatant obstruction but Ally is right Vic has got be stronger and kick these cunts out of the way
Mindlessly backing every decision in favour of your team doesn't make you some legendary spurs fan, it makes you incredibly biased and uninformed.No, no, no. Some fela here will tell you he’s soft keeper. Fucking ridiculous to call themselves Spurs fans.
Should never startFucking hoijberg