If anything thinks that, they are being silly. Just that we cant claim in any shift of policy yet, until the window is over. We've mostly operated in a way that we spend with what we have sold. If we end up selling one of our better players to compensate for Tangy's purchase , nothing much has changed. Shouldnt include Trippier in one of our better players, so that sale is just a positive on its own.
We know they're out there, right?
I agree with your post tho. However, if we get all our business done as required and don't significantly break net spend that really needn't be a basis for criticism tho.... Just points to good business... The sooner the stadium get's paid off and we are free of the burden of loan-interest the better.