Would you mind finding a long exciting piece instead?A long boring piece in The Guardian about Tottenham's regeneration...
http://www.theguardian.com/artandde...eneration-londons-most-deprived-spurs-stadium
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Would you mind finding a long exciting piece instead?A long boring piece in The Guardian about Tottenham's regeneration...
http://www.theguardian.com/artandde...eneration-londons-most-deprived-spurs-stadium
Would you mind finding a long exciting piece instead?
It's almost like one of your wikipedia postsWould you mind finding a long exciting piece instead?
"It sounds great, but Tottenham’s distinctive character is at risk, say objectors"A long boring piece in The Guardian about Tottenham's regeneration...
http://www.theguardian.com/artandde...eneration-londons-most-deprived-spurs-stadium
A fairly badly written article, but with one great line:A long boring piece in The Guardian about Tottenham's regeneration...
http://www.theguardian.com/artandde...eneration-londons-most-deprived-spurs-stadium
Dude, the media would melt to pieces if we started singing old slave work songs.
waiting for the nfl franchise that's all !!All this optimization due to a car park? Where is the capacity-raise? The new architects? The naming-rights sponsor?
All this optimization due to a car park? Where is the capacity-raise? The new architects? The naming-rights sponsor?
Don't misjudge me, I am patient, I was just hoping the optimization meant something more glorious than a car park. And yes, I know that there will be further changes.Did you not read the article. The man said have some patience! So be patient.
It's 61,000 - the 56,000 was an older design.Pleased that we've sorted out the Archway situation.
One problem with any major changes now might be that we would need new planning permission. I'm quite happy with 56,000 capacity, as long as there's scope to extend it at a later date. For me the key thing is I hope we don't have to move to a temporary home, that makes me nervous.
It's 61,000 - the 56,000 was an older design.
Don't want to over egg it, but the stadium manager told my mate who was working there. And MK. We'll see.Hopefully there will be a confirmation of the new capacity being 61k soon. The only thing I've seen was from the press.
All this optimization due to a car park? Where is the capacity-raise? The new architects? The naming-rights sponsor?
Joe you may well be ITK on this.It's 61,000 - the 56,000 was an older design.