A generation of Owners

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

The best?


  • Total voters
    38
REPost: wanted to see as many Spurs fans opinion on this as possible.

This case study looks back over almost three and a half decades of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club's Ownerships. It examines the people behind the club from 1982 through to the present day, focusing on the four men at the helm; Irving Scholar, Alan Sugar, Daniel Levy and Joe Lewis.
.
Irving Scholar
scholar_zpswyhansrp.png

Scholar (right) pictured with Terry Venables (left)
In June 1984, shortly after bringing Tottenham Hotspur its first European trophy in twelve years, Keith Burkinshaw left White Hart Lane for the last time. Greeted by the press outside the ground, he gesticulated over his shoulder towards the rear of the shiny new stand behind him. ‘There used to be a football club over there’, he is said to have spat with contempt. These words may even have been apocryphal, but they turned out to be more prescient than anybody at that time than anybody could have imagined at the time. Whilst many might contend that football in Englands revolution began with the beginning of the Premier League in 1992, the truth of the matter is that the formation of this league was in many respects the end of a story rather than the beginning of one, and if that story has a birthplace then we could contend that this was at White Hart Lane. The application of Thatcherism to our national pastime began in a working class corner of North London, and its champion was a Monaco-based property developer in his late thirties: Irving Scholar.

Footballs decline as a spectator sport from the late 1950s on has been well documented, and Tottenham Hotspur itself declined throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Spurs had become the first club to win the league and cup double in 1961, but these were heights that wouldn’t be matched again. Throughout the 1960s and early 1970s there would be occasional false dawns at White Hart Lane, a League Cup here, an FA Cup there, but the retirement of long-time manager Bill Nicholson after sixteen years as its manager in 1974 hit the club hard. Spurs only narrowly avoided relegation the following season and when they did fall through the trapdoor in 1977 it felt like an inevitable culmination to several years of mismanagement. This, though, was about as bad as things got for the club. Burkinshaw may have taken the club down that year, but he romotion back into the First Division at the first attempt the following year, and the arrival of Osvaldo Ardiles and Ricardo Villa in the summer of 1978 was a clear signal of intent from a club emerging from the doldrums. In 1981 and 1982 the club won the FA Cup, and league performances improved sufficiently under Burkinshaw for him to begin to recognised as a man who could potentially get Spurs back to challenging for the league championship.

Away from the pitch, however, the times were a-changing. The West Stand at White Hart Lane was demolished in 1980, but its replacement overran its budget, took fifteen months to complete and left the directors of the club struggling to retain control of the club. In November 1982, and with the club in £4m of debt – a very large sum by the standards of the time – it was time for a change. The old directors, led by the families of Sidney Wale and Arthur Richardson, were swept away and a new group, led by a thirty-five year old property developer called Irving Scholar and with a board of directors led by a solicitor called Douglas Alexiou, replaced them. Within twelve months, the face of Tottenham Hotspur FC (and, we might venture, the face of the ownership of English football clubs) was changed forever. In the summer of 1983, Scholar announced that Tottenham Hotspur would become the first sports club anywhere in the world to float on the stock market. This, he claimed, would allow new investment in the club and patch the holes left by the over-budget West Stand at White Hart Lane and the growing discrepancy between static club incomes and spiraling transfer fees.

The clubs lawyers, however, identified one major issue which might yet cause problems for the floatation – a statute on the FAs rule books which prevented paying part-time directors and unlimited dividends to share-holders whilst restricting what could happen to the assets of a club were it to be wound up. The lawyers came up with a solution to this that was almost too easy to be true. They simply made Tottenham Hotspur FC a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tottenham Hotspur PLC and floated the holding company on the stock market instead. They sought the Football Associations permission to do this but it is not even known whether they received a response, and so it was that the FAs ninety year old statute which was designed specifically to prevent football clubs being used for the purposes of financial speculation was left effectively impotent. It’s a template that has been used time and again over the last three decades.

The following year, in August 1984, the first annual meeting announced pre-tax profits of £902,000 in comparison with £168,000 for the previous financial year. In spite of this, however, the decline of English football continued unabated and by the summer of 1985, with almost one hundred people dead as a result of the disasters of Bradford and Heysel, talk was starting to build of the biggest clubs seeking to break away from the rest. By October 1985 the fact that such discussions were taking place between the biggest clubs was an open secret, with Scholar himself saying after a meeting in Manchester between the owners of Spurs, Woolwich, Manchester United, Liverpool and Everton that, “If we don’t make changes, our sport will continue to decline.” This attempt at a breakaway in 1985 was quelled by the ‘Heathrow Agreement’, which allowed the First Division clubs to keep 50% of all TV and sponsorship revenue, but change, by this time, was in the air for the biggest clubs in England.

east%20sstand_zpsdpwy3rva.png

East Stand before it was demolished

Within six years, though, it would be Tottenham Hotspur that would be in decline. The 1988 reconstruction of the East Stand caused issues with supporters who had stood on The Shelf – which was to be largely replaced by executive boxes – and a delay which meant that the clubs first game of the 1988/89 season, against Coventry City (which was due to be the home league debut for a certain Paul Gascoigne, for whom Spurs had lavished an albeit brief record transfer fee of £2m), had to be postponed just six hours before kick-off because assurances which had been given that it would pass the necessary safety regulations to enable the fixture to go ahead as arrange had not been adhered to. Meanwhile, the club overreached itself with deals such as a sportswear deal with Hummel which went sour, with difficulties with supply and external economic pressures leaving the club heavily in debt by the end of the decade.

In the summer of 1990, things came to a head at White Hart Lane for Irving Scholar. With the club by this time heading towards serious financial difficulties, in the summer of that year Scholar approached one Robert Maxwell in a bid to raise further funds for the club through a loan deal. Maxwell loaned the club the £1.1m required to sign Gary Lineker from Barcelona and for a while it looked as if Maxwell might even buy the club, but this time it was Scholar who lost the battle in the boardroom – other members of the board were solidly against Maxwells involvement at the club, the support was implacably involved with his involvement and the fact that Scholar was borrowing from him in itself said a lot about the clubs by now parlous financial state – and he resigned his boardroom position in early in 1991 after shares in the club were suspended on the stock exchange. After a protracted battle against Maxwell, Terry Venables – backed at the time by Alan Sugar – would eventually gain control of the club in June of 1991.

Albert Einstein famously said that the definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. On two separate occasions, Irving Scholar was involved in the stock market flotation of a football club and both occasions - Spurs and Forest - discord between those interested primarily in making money and those who put the interests of the football club at heart. Irving Scholar was far from mad. In the early 1980s, he saw that football was failing under what passed for the financial model that it had been following and sought to change it. Those changes – changes which he foresaw with the vast swathes of executive boxes and the talks of a breakaway super league in 1985 – came to pass, for better or for worse, but his conviction that the stock markets could rescue footballs financing had almost disastrous effects for both of the clubs at which he was involved. Criticised as an “out-of-town investor” at Nottingham Forest and eventually run out of Tottenham Hotspur after almost destroying The Shelf and attempting a deal with the devil in the form of Robert Maxwell, Irving Scholar turned out to be the sort of “blue sky thinker” that football could well do without.

01_zps98veay0c.png

Results in the League during Scholar's tenure.
 
Alan Sugar
sugar%20and%20el%20tel_zps3x6ossfs.png

Sugar (left) pictured with Terry Venables (right)
After a take-over battle with Robert Maxwell, Sugar teamed up with Terry Venables and bought Tottenham Hotspur football club in June 1991. Although Sugar's initial investment helped ease the financial troubles the club was suffering at the time, his treatment of Tottenham as a business venture and not a footballing one made him an unpopular figure among the Spurs fans. In Sugar's nine years as chairman, Tottenham Hotspur did not finish in the top six in the league and won just one trophy, the 1999 Football League Cup.

Sugar sacked Venables the night before the 1993 FA Cup Final, a decision which led to Venables appealing to the high courts for reinstatement. A legal battle for the club took place over the summer, which Sugar won. The decision to sack Venables angered many of Tottenham fans, and Sugar later said, "I felt as though I'd killed Bambi."

In 1992 he was the only representative of the then big five (Woolwich, Everton, Liverpool, Manchester United and Tottenham) who voted in favour of Sky's bid for Premier League television rights. The other four voted in favour of ITV's bid, as it had promised to show big fives games more often. At the time of the vote, Sugar's company Amstrad was developing satellite dishes for Sky.

In 1994 Sugar financed the transfers of three stars of the 1994 World Cup: Ilie Dumitrescu, Gica Popescu, and most notably Jürgen Klinsmann, who had an excellent first season in English football, being named Footballer of the Year. Because Spurs had not qualified for the UEFA Cup, Klinsmann decided to invoke an opt-out clause in his contract and left for Bayern Munich in the summer of 1995. Sugar appeared on television holding the last shirt Klinsmann wore for Spurs and said he wouldn't wash his car with it.

sugar%20shirt_zpsylhrehws.png

Sugar pictured on BBC Grandstand in 1995 throwing Klinsmann's shirt

He called foreigners coming into the Premier League at high wages as "Carlos Kickaballs".

Klinsmann retaliated by calling Sugar "a man without honour", and said:

"He only ever talks about money. He never talks about the game. I would say there is a big question mark over whether Sugar's heart is in the club and in football. The big question is what he likes more, the business or the football?"

Klinsmann re-signed for Tottenham on loan in December 1997.

In October 1998, former Tottenham striker Teddy Sheringham released his autobiography, in which he attacked Sugar as the reason he left Tottenham in 1997. Sheringham said Sugar had accused him of feigning injury during a long spell on the sidelines during the 1993/1994 season. He wrote that Sugar had refused to give him the five-year contract he wanted, as he had not believed Sheringham would still get into the Tottenham team when he was 36. Sheringham returned to Tottenham after his spell at Manchester United and continued to start for the first team until he was released in the summer of 2003, at age 37. Sheringham said that Sugar lacked ambition and was hypocritical. As an example, Sugar asked him for recommendations of players; when Sheringham suggested England midfielder Paul Ince, Sugar refused because he did not want to spend £4 million on a player who would soon be 30. After Sheringham left Spurs, Sugar approved the signing of Les Ferdinand, aged 31, for a club record £6 million, on higher wages than Sheringham had wanted.

Sugar appointed seven managers in his time at Spurs. The first was Peter Shreeves, followed by the dual management team of Doug Livermore and Ray Clemence, former Spurs midfielder Osvaldo Ardiles, and up and coming young manager Gerry Francis. In 1997 Sugar stunned the footballing world by appointing the relatively unknown Swiss manager Christian Gross. Gross lasted 9 months as Spurs finished in 14th place in 1998, and began the next season with just 3 points from their opening three games. Sugar next appointed George Graham, a former player and manager of bitter rivals Woolwich. Despite his earning Tottenham's first trophy in 8 years, the Spurs fans never warmed to Graham, partly because of his Woolwich connections. They disliked the negative, defensive style of football which he had Spurs playing; fans claimed it was not the "Tottenham way".

In February 2001, Sugar sold his majority stake at Tottenham to leisure group ENIC, selling 27% of the club for £22 million. In June 2007, Sugar sold his remaining shares to ENIC for £25 million, ending his 16-year association with the club. He has described his time at Tottenham as "a waste of my life". Sugar later donated £3 million from the proceeds of the sale of his interests in Tottenham Hotspur to the refurbishment of the Hackney Empire in his native East End of London.

02_zpse0nfxmqv.png

Results in the League during Sugar's tenure.
 
Joe Lewis
lewis_zpsddnxxcsn.png

Lewis (left) pictured at White Hart Lane with Spurs chairman; Daniel Levy (right)
Joe Lewis is very much the 'vehicle' that transports Tottenham but the driver is very much the current Chairman; Daniel Levy.

Levy's reign has seen a succession of managers (George Graham, Glenn Hoddle and David Pleat). With Martin Jol as manager, Spurs finished fifth in the Premier League, (their highest position until the fourth place finish in the 2009-10 campaign) and the club qualified for the UEFA Cup, a feat they repeated again the following season. However Levy's decision to fire Martin Jol after a poor start to the 2007/2008 season, when many of the players appeared to be unfit, was widely regarded as a rash move by Tottenham supporters.

The appointment of a new management team, including the highly regarded Juande Ramos as head coach resulted in some short-lived optimism amongst the Tottenham fans. On 24 February 2008, Tottenham beat Chelsea 2-1 at Wembley in the 2008 Football League Cup Final to win their first trophy in nine years, and their first under Levy's reign, and gain automatic qualification for the UEFA cup. A year later they reached the final for a second successive year, this time losing to Manchester United on penalties. However, at the start of the following season Spurs' league form took a disastrous turn which culminated in their worst ever start to a league campaign in 2008/09.

In the late hours of 25 October 2008, Daniel Levy took the decision to fire Sporting Director Damien Comolli, Head Coach Juande Ramos, first team coaches, Marcos Álvarez and Gus Poyet. Levy then installed Harry Redknapp as the new Head Coach of Tottenham. The move proved hugely successful, as a dramatic upturn in Tottenham's form on the pitch saw them steadily climb out of relegation zone to eventually finish in eighth position. Further progress was made in the 2009/2010 season, with Spurs finishing in the top four and winning entry into the qualification round of the UEFA Champions League for the first time. 2010-11 saw another excellent season for Tottenham, as they finished top of their Champions League group, beating holders Inter Milan along the way, and then dispatching AC Milan in the knock-out stages. Their exciting Champions' League run ended at the hands of Real Madrid. Tottenham finished fifth in the Premier League 2010-11 season, missing out on Champions' League qualification but securing a place in the Europa League after overtaking Liverpool with victory at Anfield in the penultimate game of the season.

The summer of 2011 was a tough time at Tottenham, with Chelsea trying to sign star player Luka Modric, however Levy refused to sell. After losing to both Manchester clubs, Spurs won ten of their next eleven Premier League games, drawing the other. The club equalled their best ever Premier League run of six consecutive wins, also achieving their best league start since the double-winning team of the 1960-1 season, gaining 31 points from a possible 39.
On 14 June 2012 and after failing to reach the champions league, Redknapp was sacked by Levy despite finishing 4th in the Premier League. On 3 July the club appointed former Chelsea and Porto boss Andre Villas-Boas as new head coach.

After Tottenham finished outside the Champions League places at the end of the 2012/13 season, in a protracted summer transfer deal Levy negotiated the sale of star winger Gareth Bale to Real Madrid for a world record transfer fee of £86 million. Following some poor results in the first half of the 2013-14 season, including a 5-0 home defeat by Liverpool, Levy sacked Villas-Boas on 16 December 2013. Assistant coach Tim Sherwood was subsequently announced as manager following the sacking of Villas-Boas. Despite signing an 18 month contract with Spurs, and leading Tottenham to a 6th place finish in the Premier League, Sherwood was himself sacked at the season's end on 13 May 2014.

tg_zpshytaxdp3.png

Tottenham Hotspur's New Training facility opened in 2012

The new architecturally designed Tottenham Hotspur Training Centre has been built on 77 acres and is located on Hotspur Way, Enfield. It is the home of the Club's First Team and Academy and is recognised as one of the best in Europe.

The state-of-the-art facility - which includes a covered artificial pitch, world-class player preparation areas, pool and hydrotherapy complex, altitude room, large-scale gymnasium and specialist sports rehabilitation suites - will support the Club's ambitions to attract, develop and retain the highest quality talent.

There are 15 grass pitches across the site including four dedicated solely for First Team Training and one and a half artificial outdoor pitches with floodlighting. The First Team Match pitch is built to exactly the same specification as the pitch at White Hart Lane.

whl_zpsz5hgkwwv.png

new stadium currently under construction,, due to open in 2018

ENIC are currently overseeing the redevelopment of the entire club's stadium and the surrounding borough of Tottenham.

In October 2008, Levy presented plans for a new stadium for Tottenham Hotspur. The intention was to build it adjacent to the current stadium, White Hart Lane, and for it to hold 56,264 spectators. The new stadium complex would also include leisure areas, public spaces, a museum, restaurants, a supermarket and shops, a hotel and apartments. The development was called the Northumberland Development Project (NDP) and work could start on the project soon after it received planning permission by Haringey Council, probably at the end of September 2010.

The scheme was delayed due to a local business refusing to relocate from the plot intended to construct the new stadium. Archway Steel of Paxton Road - the street adjacent to the current White Hart Lane stadium, behind the club's north stand - contested the legal grounds for Tottenham obtaining a Compulsory Purchase Order (COP). Haringey Council was granted permission to issue a Compulsory Purchase Order to Archway Sheet Metals by Eric Pickles, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government in June 2014 on which, the Steel Works company appealed.

However, the firm had its legal bid against a compulsory purchase order rejected at the High Court in February, 2015. Archway has announced that it will not be appealing the decision, meaning that Spurs can proceed with their £400 million redevelopment of White Hart Lane.


New stadium TimeLine

April 2008 - Spurs began investigations into the Wingate industrial estate adjacent to White Hart Lane with a view to stadium expansion.

December 2008 - Designs for the new stadium are unveiled. An intended completion date of the start of the 2012-13 season was revealed by Daniel Levy.

April 2009 - Tottenham announce they will issue 30m new shares to raise £15m for the first stage of the proposed development.

October 2009 - Planning application to Haringey Council is submitted.

May 2010 - Tottenham withdraw planning application and submit a revised plan.

March 2013 - West Ham are confirmed as Olympic Stadium tenants and Tottenham focus all attentions on the current project.

April 2013 - Public Inquiry is held about last remaining properties to be acquired.

July 2014 - Secretary of State Eric Pickles grants compulsory purchase order for the last piece of land.

February 2015 - Archway are informed there is no legal flaw in Tottenham's compulsory purchase order, removing the final hurdle.

03_zpsakarwhmb.png

Results in the League during ENIC's tenure.


Ultimate ownership of the Club

Of the total issued share capital of Tottenham Hotspur Limited, ENIC International Limited own 85.0%.

Mr D. Levy and certain members of his family are potential beneficiaries of a discretionary trust which ultimately owns 29.4% of the share capital of ENIC International Limited.

Mr J Lewis has an interest of 70.6% of ENIC International Limited.




references [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
 
Last edited:
Good article, lots of interesting stuff I never knew, eg that Maxwell lent us the money to buy Lineker. So 'Cap'n Bob 'did a good thing for us there:thumbup:

I'm undecided as to how to vote, with regard to trophies, Scholar was best then Sugar, with ENIC having the worst trophies to year ratio of all of them. But finance-wise ENIC have been the best. Lge-wise, the average seems to be close between Scholar and ENIC, but our peaks were better under Scholar.

One mistake I noticed in the 'honours list', AFAIK we won the FA Cup in 1991 under Scholar not Sugar.
 
Last edited:
ENIC. As much as they piss me off with their transfer shenanigans at times when we seem to be on the brink of achieving, the club is in safe financial hands with the best training facilities around & a new stadium (ahem)...on the horizon.
If they back the manager this summer in the market & we hit the ground running, maintain managerial stability & look like we are going to raise a serious challenge to the sky 4 or win a trophy (hopefully both), then they will be great owners. If we fuck up, then of course I reserve the right to change my mind & say they are shit.
 
ENIC. As much as they piss me off with their transfer shenanigans at times when we seem to be on the brink of achieving, the club is in safe financial hands with the best training facilities around & a new stadium (ahem)...on the horizon.
If they back the manager this summer in the market & we hit the ground running, maintain managerial stability & look like we are going to raise a serious challenge to the sky 4 or win a trophy (hopefully both), then they will be great owners. If we fuck up, then of course I reserve the right to change my mind & say they are shit.
Like it Bolton :)
 
#Levy_out should read the poll results. I guess it is easy to sit by and shout abuse at someone but whe you present facts and figures, it is hard to dismiss the black and white statistics of league positions.

Someone said that the points totals are a better measurement of league placements. Do you think that point of view is valid?
 
#Levy_out should read the poll results. I guess it is easy to sit by and shout abuse at someone but whe you present facts and figures, it is hard to dismiss the black and white statistics of league positions.

Someone said that the points totals are a better measurement of league placements. Do you think that point of view is valid?
They can be. League positions are better to compare against other teams in the same season, but don't work as well to compare season to season. For example 38 points can get you comfortably mid table some seasons and relegated in others.
 
They can be. League positions are better to compare against other teams in the same season, but don't work as well to compare season to season. For example 38 points can get you comfortably mid table some seasons and relegated in others.

I agree. 72 points one year is or isn't CL football. The same as playing Moyes was easier than playing Old Red Face.

The final standings seem to be the clearest barometer to gauge a team and a season.
 
Back
Top Bottom